Averages
Pro-ESG
Anti-ESG
State Voting Average
30%
State Voting Average
14.81%
State Rank
19th
State Rank
38th
Asset Manager Average
37%
Asset Manager Average
4%
By Asset Manager
ACM Funds
Percentage of times Mgr. voted “for” pro-ESG proposals:
13%
BlackRock
Percentage of times Mgr. voted “for” pro-ESG proposals:
30%
Blackstone
Percentage of times Mgr. voted “for” pro-ESG proposals:
31%
Brookfield Asset Management
Percentage of times Mgr. voted “for” pro-ESG proposals:
31%
Invesco Advisors
Percentage of times Mgr. voted “for” pro-ESG proposals:
38%
Prudential Investments
Percentage of times Mgr. voted “for” pro-ESG proposals:
39%
Homestead Funds
Percentage of times Mgr. voted “for” pro-ESG proposals:
39%
Berkshire
Percentage of times Mgr. voted “for” pro-ESG proposals:
39%
Asset Manager Voting
Board Diversity:
23%
Require Environmental/Social Qualifications:
18%
Establish Environmental/Social Committee:
2%
Link Executive Pay to Social Goals:
0%
Climate Change:
34%
GHG Emissions:
32%
Climate Change Action:
13%
Report on Healthcare/Abortion:
15%
Weapons-Related Proposals:
6%
Social Proposal:
7%
Income Inequality:
7%
Political Activities and Action:
8%
Political Contributions and Lobbying:
22%
Political Lobbying Disclosure:
40%
Racial Equity Audit:
58%
Management Environmental Proposals:
97%
Anti-Social:
5%
Charitable Contributions:
7%
State Voting
Board Diversity:
40.0%
Require Environmental/Social Qualifications:
100.0%
Establish Environmental/Social Committee:
0.0%
Link Executive Pay to Social Goals:
0.0%
Climate Change:
29.4%
GHG Emissions:
70.0%
Report on Healthcare/Abortion:
50.0%
Weapons-Related Proposals:
50.0%
Social Proposal:
57.9%
Income Inequality:
23.1%
Political Activities and Action:
18.2%
Political Contributions and Lobbying:
50.0%
Political Contributions and Lobbying:
63.0%
Racial Equity Audit:
100.0%
Management Environmental Proposals:
100.0%
Anti-Social:
0.0%
Charitable Contributions:
100.0%