Averages
Pro-ESG
Anti-ESG
State Voting Average
74%
State Voting Average
18.52%
State Rank
49th
State Rank
13th
Asset Manager Average
60%
Asset Manager Average
7%
By Asset Manager
Blackstone
Percentage of times Mgr. voted “for” pro-ESG proposals:
60%
Brookfield Asset Management
Percentage of times Mgr. voted “for” pro-ESG proposals:
62%
Homestead Funds
Percentage of times Mgr. voted “for” pro-ESG proposals:
60%
Asset Manager Voting
Board Diversity:
17%
Require Environmental/Social Qualifications:
0%
Establish Environmental/Social Committee:
0%
Link Executive Pay to Social Goals:
0%
Climate Change:
50%
GHG Emissions:
29%
Climate Change Action:
29%
Report on Healthcare/Abortion:
0%
Weapons-Related Proposals:
0%
Social Proposal:
0%
Income Inequality:
0%
Political Activities and Action:
0%
Political Contributions and Lobbying:
63%
Political Lobbying Disclosure:
92%
Racial Equity Audit:
75%
Management Environmental Proposals:
96%
Anti-Social:
0%
Charitable Contributions:
20%
State Voting
Board Diversity:
100.0%
Require Environmental/Social Qualifications:
100.0%
Establish Environmental/Social Committee:
100.0%
Link Executive Pay to Social Goals:
100.0%
Climate Change:
77.1%
GHG Emissions:
100.0%
Report on Healthcare/Abortion:
100.0%
Weapons-Related Proposals:
100.0%
Social Proposal:
83.3%
Income Inequality:
68.8%
Political Activities and Action:
81.8%
Political Contributions and Lobbying:
100.0%
Political Contributions and Lobbying:
100.0%
Racial Equity Audit:
73.3%
Management Environmental Proposals:
66.7%
Anti-Social:
28.6%
Charitable Contributions:
7.7%