Averages
Pro-ESG
Anti-ESG
State Voting Average
84%
State Voting Average
18.52%
State Rank
5th
State Rank
47th
Asset Manager Average
30%
Asset Manager Average
3%
By Asset Manager
Fidelity Insitutional Asset Management LLC
Percentage of times Mgr. voted “for” pro-ESG proposals:
23%
JP Morgan Asset Management
Percentage of times Mgr. voted “for” pro-ESG proposals:
29%
Loomis Sayles
Percentage of times Mgr. voted “for” pro-ESG proposals:
29%
State Street Funds
Percentage of times Mgr. voted “for” pro-ESG proposals:
30%
State Street Global Advisors
Percentage of times Mgr. voted “for” pro-ESG proposals:
30%
Asset Manager Voting
Board Diversity:
15%
Require Environmental/Social Qualifications:
0%
Establish Environmental/Social Committee:
1%
Link Executive Pay to Social Goals:
7%
Climate Change:
26%
GHG Emissions:
34%
Climate Change Action:
19%
Report on Healthcare/Abortion:
3%
Weapons-Related Proposals:
3%
Social Proposal:
10%
Income Inequality:
4%
Political Activities and Action:
4%
Political Contributions and Lobbying:
24%
Political Lobbying Disclosure:
32%
Racial Equity Audit:
26%
Management Environmental Proposals:
97%
Anti-Social:
2%
Charitable Contributions:
4%
State Voting
Board Diversity:
100.0%
Require Environmental/Social Qualifications:
100.0%
Establish Environmental/Social Committee:
100.0%
Link Executive Pay to Social Goals:
100.0%
Climate Change:
97.9%
GHG Emissions:
100.0%
Report on Healthcare/Abortion:
100.0%
Weapons-Related Proposals:
100.0%
Social Proposal:
96.9%
Income Inequality:
100.0%
Political Activities and Action:
83.3%
Political Contributions and Lobbying:
100.0%
Political Contributions and Lobbying:
100.0%
Racial Equity Audit:
73.3%
Management Environmental Proposals:
100.0%
Anti-Social:
28.6%
Charitable Contributions:
7.7%