Averages
Pro-ESG
Anti-ESG
State Voting Average
79%
State Voting Average (Anti-ESG):
3.7%
State Rank
13th
State Rank (Anti-ESG):
44th
Asset Manager Average
35%
Asset Manager Average (Anti-ESG):
4%
By Asset Manager
Artisan Partners
Percentage of times Mgr. voted “for” pro-ESG proposals:
37%
BlackRock
Percentage of times Mgr. voted “for” pro-ESG proposals:
30%
Champlain Funds
Percentage of times Mgr. voted “for” pro-ESG proposals:
30%
Mondrian Investment Partners
Percentage of times Mgr. voted “for” pro-ESG proposals:
31%
PIMCO
Percentage of times Mgr. voted “for” pro-ESG proposals:
34%
UBS
Percentage of times Mgr. voted “for” pro-ESG proposals:
35%
Acadian Asset Management
Percentage of times Mgr. voted “for” pro-ESG proposals:
35%
Asset Manager Voting
Board Diversity:
26%
Require Environmental/Social Qualifications:
0%
Establish Environmental/Social Committee:
2%
Link Executive Pay to Social Goals:
8%
Climate Change:
27%
GHG Emissions:
29%
Climate Change Action:
13%
Report on Healthcare/Abortion:
22%
Weapons-Related Proposals:
9%
Social Proposal:
14%
Income Inequality:
0%
Political Activities and Action:
3%
Political Contributions and Lobbying:
17%
Political Lobbying Disclosure:
31%
Racial Equity Audit:
58%
Management Environmental Proposals:
94%
Anti-Social:
3%
Charitable Contributions:
4%
State Voting
Board Diversity:
100.0%
Require Environmental/Social Qualifications:
100.0%
Establish Environmental/Social Committee:
100.0%
Link Executive Pay to Social Goals:
100.0%
Climate Change:
87.0%
GHG Emissions:
100.0%
Report on Healthcare/Abortion:
100.0%
Weapons-Related Proposals:
80.0%
Social Proposal:
83.6%
Income Inequality:
89.5%
Political Activities and Action:
83.3%
Political Contributions and Lobbying:
90.0%
Political Contributions and Lobbying:
96.2%
Racial Equity Audit:
73.1%
Management Environmental Proposals:
100.0%
Anti-Social:
7.1%
Charitable Contributions:
0.0%