Expand Energy

Industries Commercial and Professional Services, Energy
Subsidiaries Cheasapeake Energy Louisiana Corp., Chesapeake Energy Marketing, Chesapeake Operating, Inc., Diamond Y Enterprise, Inc., Gene D. Yost & Son, Inc., Nomac Drilling Corp.
Activism

The biggest 1000 U.S. companies by revenue according to form 10-K.

CEO Action Pledge

Rating Overview

Risk Rating: Medium

Expand Energy is Medium Risk.

Chesapeake Energy Corporation often yields to political activism in shaping corporate governance, potentially alienating consumers, dividing employees, and harming shareholders. The company implements race and identity-based policies that replace merit, excellence, and integrity with preferential treatment and outcomes. Chesapeake Energy occasionally embraces corporate initiatives that redirect its central focus from business goals to partisan policies and divisive issues at times. This approach fails to safeguard free exercise, free speech, and free enterprise.

Rating Criteria

Corporate Weaponization Risk Levels
Criteria Risk Level
Cancellations Medium Risk
Discriminatory Philanthropy High Risk
Employment Protection High Risk

Corporate Weaponization

Corporate Governance and Public Policy Risk Levels
Criteria Risk Level
Advocacy Bias High Risk
Funding Lower Risk
Political Actions Lower Risk

Corporate Governance and Public Policy

Rating Criteria Detail

Criteria Risk Level Rationale

Corporate Weaponization


Criteria:

Has canceled customers, suppliers, or vendors due to their political views or religious beliefs OR corporately boycotts, divests, or sanctions regions, people groups, or industries.

Risk Level:

Medium

Rationale:

Chesapeake Energy’s HRC 2023-2024 CEI rating indicates the company recruits employees based on sexual identity. The company discriminates against vendors that do not promote divisive sex and gender policies, indicating it prioritizes sexual issues over merit (1)(2). The company integrates ESG into all of its business practices. Its “culture and values demand continuous improvement of our ESG performance across all facets of our company” (3). However, it has not publicly canceled customers, suppliers, or vendors based on political views or religious beliefs (4).

Criteria:

Charitable giving (including employee matching programs) policies or practices discriminate against charitable organizations based on views or religious beliefs.

Risk Level:

High

Rationale:

Chesapeake Energy’s HRC 2023-2024 CEI rating indicates the company will not donate to non-religious charities unless they embrace controversial sexual identity policies (1)(2). The company does not appear to discriminate against charitable organizations based on views or beliefs (3).

Criteria:

Employment policies fail to protect against viewpoint or other discrimination and/or are ideological in nature.

Risk Level:

High

Rationale:

Chesapeake Energy’s HRC 2023-2024 CEI rating indicates the company a specific benefits guide with a comprehensive explanation of transgender services funded by the company (1)(2). The company has also implemented DEI training for its employees (3). Chesapeake Energy protects its employees against viewpoint discrimination (4).

Corporate Governance and Public Policy


Criteria:

Uses corporate reputation to support causes, organizations, or policies hostile to freedom of expression.

Risk Level:

High

Rationale:

Chesapeake Energy committed to achieving net zero GHG emissions by 2035 (1). The company’s CEO, Domenic Dell’Osso Jr., signed the CEO Action for Diversity & Inclusion pledge, which includes a commitment to promote DEI through bias education training in the workplace, strategize on DEI programs/initiatives with other signatories, and engage boards of directors when developing and evaluating DEI strategies (2)(3).

Criteria:

Uses corporate funds to advance ideological causes, organizations, or policies hostile to freedom of expression.

Risk Level:

Lower

Rationale:

Chesapeake Energy has not used corporate funds to advance ideological causes, organizations, or policies (1).

Criteria:

Uses corporate political actions and/or financial contributions for ideological, non-business purposes.

Risk Level:

Lower

Rationale:

Chesapeake Energy has not used its PAC donations for ideological purposes and does not report on its lobbying at this time (1)(2)(3).