Luxfer Holdings - 1792 Exchange

Rating Overview

Luxfer Holdings is Medium Risk.

Luxfer is Medium Risk. The company often yields to political activism in shaping corporate governance, potentially alienating consumers, dividing employees, and harming shareholders. The company implements race and identity-based policies that replace merit, excellence, and integrity with preferential treatment and outcomes. The company occasionally embraces corporate initiatives that redirect its central focus from business goals to partisan policies and divisive issues at times. This approach fails to safeguard free exercise, free speech, and free enterprise.

Rating Criteria

Corporate Weaponization Risk Levels
Criteria	Risk Level
Cancellations	Medium Risk
Discriminatory Philanthropy	Lower Risk
Employment Protection	High Risk

Corporate Weaponization ⓘ

Corporate Governance and Public Policy Risk Levels
Criteria	Risk Level
Advocacy Bias	High Risk
Funding	Lower Risk
Political Actions	No Data

Corporate Governance and Public Policy ⓘ

Rating Criteria Detail

Criteria Risk Level Rationale

Corporate Weaponization

Criteria:

Has canceled customers, suppliers, or vendors due to their political views or religious beliefs OR corporately boycotts, divests, or sanctions regions, people groups, or industries.

Risk Level:

Medium

Rationale:

Luxfer integrates ESG into its business practices. From its 2024 Sustainability Report: “Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) stewardship extends throughout Luxfer’s businesses and is a key component of our strategy and our vision. It is a critical part of long term shareholder value, business success” (1). However, the company has not canceled customers, suppliers, or vendors based on political views or religious beliefs (2).

Criteria:

Charitable giving (including employee matching programs) policies or practices discriminate against charitable organizations based on views or religious beliefs.

Risk Level:

Lower

Rationale:

Luxfer does not appear to discriminate against charitable organizations based on views or beliefs (1).

Criteria:

Employment policies fail to protect against viewpoint or other discrimination and/or are ideological in nature.

Risk Level:

High

Rationale:

Luxfer requires its employees to take unconscious bias and DEI training (1). It appears to prioritize diversity over merit in its hiring. From its 2024 Sustainaiblity Report: “Our diversity initiatives are integral to creating an inclusive culture at Luxfer. These initiatives encompass a range of best practices and policies that support equitable recruitment and selection processes, focusing on sourcing candidates from diverse backgrounds” (2). It does not provide viewpoint protections for its employees (3).

Corporate Governance and Public Policy

Criteria:

Uses corporate reputation to support causes, organizations, or policies hostile to freedom of expression.

Risk Level:

High

Rationale:

Luxfer supports DEI within its business practices. From its 2024 Sustainability Report: “Promote diversity, equity, and inclusion through strategic initiatives to foster a more inclusive workplace”. The company supports ESG within its business practices: “Luxfer’s Board of Directors understands the critical need to incorporate Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) risks, including climate risks, into its decision-making processes” (1). Otherwise, it has not supported ideological causes or policies (2).

Criteria:

Uses corporate funds to advance ideological causes, organizations, or policies hostile to freedom of expression.

Risk Level:

Lower

Rationale:

Luxfer has not used corporate funds to advance ideological causes, organizations, or policies (1).

Criteria:

Uses corporate political actions and/or financial contributions for ideological, non-business purposes.

Risk Level:

N/A

Rationale:

Luxfer does not operate a PAC or report on its lobbying at this time (1)(2)(3).