HAVI
Rating Overview
Rating Criteria
Rating Criteria Detail
Corporate Weaponization
Criteria:
Has canceled customers, suppliers, or vendors due to their political views or religious beliefs OR corporately boycotts, divests, or sanctions regions, people groups, or industries.
Risk Level:
MediumRationale:
HAVI believes sustainability “requires… accountability” from its suppliers and partners to meet its Better Future Together blueprint, which includes being net zero carbon emissions by 2050 (1). The company is committed to fighting the “climate crisis” and “engaging” its suppliers and vendors with its sustainability goals, though it is unclear if that means forcing them to abide by its commitments (2). HAVI and PMI have not publicly fired customers, suppliers, or vendors based on ideological views or religious beliefs (3).
Criteria:
Charitable giving (including employee matching programs) policies or practices discriminate against charitable organizations based on views or religious beliefs.
Risk Level:
N/ACriteria:
Employment policies fail to protect against viewpoint or other discrimination and/or are ideological in nature.
Risk Level:
HighRationale:
HAVI provides unconscious bias training for its employees (1). The company requires employees to take inclusion training, which includes recruitment bias and microaggression training. It also actively seeks to partner with external organizations and NGOs to advocate for sustainability and DEI causes (2)(3). The company does not provide viewpoint protections for its employees (4).
Corporate Governance and Public Policy
Criteria:
Uses corporate reputation to support causes, organizations, or policies hostile to freedom of expression.
Risk Level:
HighRationale:
HAVI is committed to net zero carbon emissions by 2050 (1)(2). The company’s former CEO, Russ Smyth, signed the CEO Action for Diversity & Inclusion pledge, which includes a commitment to promote DEI through bias education training in the workplace, strategize on DEI programs/initiatives with other signatories, and engage boards of directors when developing and evaluating DEI strategies (3)(4).
Criteria:
Uses corporate funds to advance ideological causes, organizations, or policies hostile to freedom of expression.
Risk Level:
Medium