
Abbott Laboratories
Corporate Bias Rating
Expand Summary
Risk Level:
Summary:
Abbott Laboratories is High Risk. The company yields to political activism in shaping corporate governance, potentially alienating consumers, dividing employees, and harming shareholders. The company implements race and identity-based policies that replace merit, excellence, and integrity with preferential treatment and outcomes. Abbott Laboratories embraces corporate initiatives that redirect its central focus from business goals to partisan policies and divisive issues. This approach fails to safeguard free exercise, free speech, and free enterprise.
View Full Corporate Bias Ratings ReportHas canceled customers, suppliers, or vendors due to their political views or religious beliefs OR corporately boycotts, divests, or sanctions regions, people groups, or industries.
Abbott Laboratories received a score of 100 on the 2025 Corporate Equality Index (CEI) from the Human Rights Campaign (HRC), a political stakeholder group. The company recruits employees based on sexual identity issues. The company discriminates against vendors that do not promote divisive sex and gender policies, indicating it prioritizes sexual issues over merit (1)(2). Abbott allegedly ended its relationship with lobbyist Matt Schlapp, CEO of CPAC, after his criticism of BLM and the destruction of public property (3). The company was a member of the Global Alliance for Responsible Media, which demonetized and suppressed content that it deemed to spread “hate speech” or “misinformation”, discuss “debated social issues in a negative or partisan context”, or “vilif[y]” individuals based on sexual orientation and gender identity. These arbitrary guidelines were used to censor mainstream perspectives online (4)(5)(6).
Charitable giving (including employee matching programs) policies or practices discriminate against charitable organizations based on views or religious beliefs.
Employment policies fail to protect against viewpoint or other discrimination and/or are ideological in nature.
Abbott Laboratories HRC 2025 CEI rating indicates the company forces employees to attend multiple, controversial trainings on gender identity, sexual orientation, transgender issues, and divisive racial ideology. The company provides gender transition guidelines for its employees and a specific benefits guide with a comprehensive explanation of transgender services funded by the company (1)(2). The company requires its employees to take unconscious bias training (3). The company does not provide viewpoint protections for its employees (4).
Uses corporate reputation to support causes, organizations, or policies hostile to freedom of expression.
Abbott Laboratories’ HRC 2025 CEI rating indicates the company agrees to allow a controversial stakeholder group focused on sexual identity issues to dictate marketing or advertising strategy. By doing so, the company risks dividing employees, alienating customers and harming shareholders (1)(2). The CEO of Abbott, Robert Ford, is a member of the Business Roundtable and Former CEO Miles White signed its 2019 Statement on the Purpose of a Corporation, which promotes stakeholder capitalism over traditional obligations to shareholders (3)(4). Abbott Laboratories’ scored a 90 out of 100 on the 2023-2024 Corporate Equality Index (CEI) from the Human Rights Campaign (HRC), a political stakeholder group (5)(6).
Uses corporate funds to advance ideological causes, organizations, or policies hostile to freedom of expression.
Abbott Laboratories’ HRC 2025 CEI rating indicates the company covers transgender related costs for its employees and their children, including paid short-term leave, puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, chest surgeries, genital surgeries, medical visits and lab monitoring, travel and lodging. Additionally, the company has pledged philanthropic support of at least one organization or event that promotes sex and gender ideology. By allowing a political stakeholder group to dictate operations, the company increases health care costs and risks dividing employees, alienating customers and harming shareholders (1)(2). The company was a member of the Global Alliance for Responsible Media (3)(4)(5). The company is a copper sponsor of Out & Equal and a corporate partner of the National LGBT Chamber of Commerce (6)(7). The company has donated to a Planned Parenthood clinic in California (8).
Uses corporate political actions and/or financial contributions for ideological, non-business purposes.
Abbott Laboratories’ HRC 2025 CEI rating indicates the company publicly advocated for controversial sex and gender ideology through local, state or federal legislation or initiatives. By allowing a political stakeholder group to dictate operations, the company risks dividing employees, alienating customers and harming shareholders (1)(2). The company has not used its PAC donations or lobbying for ideological purposes (3)(4)(5).
Board Bias
Expand Summary
CEO of Abbott Laboratories
Robert B. Ford
Summary:
Headquartered in Abbott Park, Illinois, Abbott Laboratories is a member of the Fortune 250 operating in the Pharmaceuticals Biotechnology and Life Sciences industry. Robert B. Ford serves as CEO/President and Chairman, leading the company’s C-suite executive team and the board of directors. Amongst these teams, the collective leadership is responsible for $363,795 to Republican causes and $80,575 to Democratic causes. Under their tenure, Abbott Laboratories currently holds a 'High Risk' risk rating.
View Full Board Bias ReportPolitical Contributions of Leadership:
$363,795
$80,575
Republican
Democrat
China Risk Database
Expand Summary
Total Estimated Sanctions (3-year Avg.)
$528,587,476
Average Annual Revenue
Global
$36,279,666,667
China Revenue
5.89%
$2,136,333,333
Annual Average of Total Assets
Global
$71,386,333,333
China Assets
5.99%
$4,277,723,590
Shareholder Proposals
Expand Summary
| Date | ESG Category | Proponent | Summary of Resolution | Mgmt Rec | Total Vote % in Favor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4/28/23 | Governance | Kenneth Steiner | Request that the Board Chairman be an Independent Director | Against | 30.50% |
| 4/28/23 | Governance | The Province of Saint Joseph of the Capuchin Order and Proxy Impact | Prepare Annual Report Disclosing Policies, Procedures, and Expenditures. | Against | 23.00% |
| 4/28/23 | Governance | The Shareholder Association for Research & Education | Financial Performance Metric for Senior Level Executives Include Legal and Compliance Costs | Against | 14.40% |
| 4/28/23 | Governance | John Chevedden | Lower Ownership Threshold for Calling Special Meetings | Against | 4.30% |
| 4/29/22 | Governance | NYC Comptroller's Office | Adopt Policy on 10b5-1 Trading Plans | Against | 48.76% |
| 4/29/22 | Governance | John Chevedden | Reduce Ownership Threshold for Shareholders to Call Special Meeting | Against | 47.15% |
| 4/29/22 | Social | Unitarian Universalist Assoc. | Report on Lobbying Payments and Policy | Against | 34.52% |
| 4/29/22 | Governance | Kenneth Steiner | Require Independent Board Chair | Against | 27.75% |
| 4/29/22 | Social | The Shareholder Commons | Report on Public Health Costs of Antimicrobial Resistance | Against | 11.51% |