FirstEnergy

Ohio
Energy

Corporate Bias Rating

Expand Summary

Risk Level:

Rating - Caution
Medium Risk

Summary:

FirstEnergy often yields to political activism in shaping corporate governance, potentially alienating consumers, dividing employees, and harming shareholders. The company implements race and identity-based policies that replace merit, excellence, and integrity with preferential treatment and outcomes. FirstEnergy occasionally embraces corporate initiatives that redirect its central focus from business goals to partisan policies and divisive issues at times. This approach fails to safeguard free exercise, free speech, and free enterprise.

View Full Corporate Bias Ratings Report
Criteria
Risk Level
Rationale
Corporate Weaponization
Criteria

Has canceled customers, suppliers, or vendors due to their political views or religious beliefs OR corporately boycotts, divests, or sanctions regions, people groups, or industries.

Risk Level
Rationale

FirstEnergy received a score of 55 on the 2025 Corporate Equality Index (CEI) from the Human Rights Campaign (HRC), a political stakeholder group. The company recruits employees based on sexual identity issues, indicating it prioritizes sexual issues over merit (1)(2). FirstEnergy has not publicly canceled customers, suppliers, or vendors based on political views or religious beliefs (3).

Criteria

Charitable giving (including employee matching programs) policies or practices discriminate against charitable organizations based on views or religious beliefs.

Risk Level
Rationale

FirstEnergy will not direct grants to “religious organizations” (1)(2). The company likely uses Benevity as its charitable giving platform. Benevity vets charities according to the Southern Poverty Law Center’s Hate List, which includes mainstream libertarian, conservative, family, and religious advocacy organizations (3)(4)(5).

Criteria

Employment policies fail to protect against viewpoint or other discrimination and/or are ideological in nature.

Risk Level
Rationale

FirstEnergy implements DEI goals through its targeted recruitment of racially diverse employees and a goal to be 30% racially and ethnically diverse by 2025. FirstEnergy held a training session for employees about “allyship and microaggressions” (1). FirstEnergy does not provide viewpoint protections for its employees (2).

Corporate Governance and Public Policy
Criteria

Uses corporate reputation to support causes, organizations, or policies hostile to freedom of expression.

Risk Level
Rationale

FirstEnergy supports ESG within its business practices and includes a goal to achieve net-zero emissions by 2050 (1). The company’s former CEO, Steven E. Strah, signed the CEO Action for Diversity & Inclusion pledge, which includes a commitment to promote DEI through bias education training in the workplace (2)(3). FirstEnergy scored a 55 out of 100 on the 2023-2024 Corporate Equality Index (CEI) from the Human Rights Campaign (HRC), a political stakeholder group (4)(5).

Criteria

Uses corporate political actions and/or financial contributions for ideological, non-business purposes.

Risk Level
Rationale

FirstEnergy’s HRC 2025 CEI rating indicates the company covers transgender related costs for its employees and their children, including paid short-term leave, puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, chest surgeries, genital surgeries, medical visits and lab monitoring, travel and lodging. By allowing a political stakeholder group to dictate operations, the company increases health care costs and risks dividing employees, alienating customers and harming shareholders (1)(2). FirstEnergy donated $1.14 million to Diversity and Inclusion related grants and sponsorships, including YWCA (3). The company is a corporate partner of the NGLCC (4). Otherwise, there are no publicly known cases of FirstEnergy using corporate funds to advance ideological causes, organizations, or policies (5).

Criteria

Uses corporate political actions and/or financial contributions for ideological, non-business purposes.

Risk Level
Rationale

FirstEnergy has not used its PAC donations or lobbying for ideological purposes (1)(2)(3).

Board Bias

Expand Summary

1792 Exchange has not yet compiled data about the board of directors or political contributions of leadership for this company.

Shareholder Proposals

Expand Summary

Date
ESG Category
Proponent
Summary of ResolutionMgmt RecTotal Vote % in Favor
5/22/24GovernanceJohn CheveddenImprove Clawback Policy for Unearned Executive PayAgainst3.17%
5/22/24EnvironmentalThe National Center for Public Policy ResearchFinancial Statement Assumptions and Climate ChangeAgainst1.22%
5/22/24EnvironmentalThe Comptroller of the State of New YorkReport on Feasibility of Integrating Climate-Related Measures into the Company’s Compensation PlansAgainst22.14%
5/24/23GovernanceJohn CheveddenShareholder Ratification of Excessive Termination PayAgainst6.10%
5/24/23EnvironmentalNational Center for Public Policy ResearchEstablish Committee on Decarbonization RiskAgainst1.50%
5/17/22GovernanceJohn CheveddenSpecial Meetings - Reduce Ownership Req. to 10%Against37.94%
5/17/22SocialSteven MilloyChild Labor AuditAgainst2.90%
Generate Reports
Clear
Toast