Triller - 1792 Exchange

Corporate Bias Rating

Expand Summary

Risk Level:

Lower Risk

Summary:

Triller is Lower Risk. The company does not yield to political activism in shaping corporate governance, preventing initiatives that potentially alienate consumers, divide employees, and harm shareholders. The company elevates merit, excellence, and integrity ahead of race and identity-based policies. Triller does not embrace corporate initiatives that redirect its central focus from business goals to partisan policies and divisive issues. This approach protects free exercise, free speech, and free enterprise.

View Full Corporate Bias Ratings Report

Criteria

Risk Level

Rationale

Corporate Weaponization

Criteria

Has canceled customers, suppliers, or vendors due to their political views or religious beliefs OR corporately boycotts, divests, or sanctions regions, people groups, or industries.

Risk Level

Rationale

Triller was sued for not meeting Equal Employment Opportunity Commission standards by denying Ferraro and Papa, two Triller creators, equal benefits based on their race (1). The case is ongoing, and it remains to be seen if Ferraro and Papa’s claims are credible or not. However, the company has not publicly canceled customers, suppliers, or vendors based on political views or religious beliefs (2).

Criteria

Charitable giving (including employee matching programs) policies or practices discriminate against charitable organizations based on views or religious beliefs.

Risk Level

N/A

Rationale

Triller does not publish charitable giving guidelines (1).

Criteria

Employment policies fail to protect against viewpoint or other discrimination and/or are ideological in nature.

Risk Level

Rationale

Triller does not provide viewpoint protections for its employees (1).

Corporate Governance and Public Policy

Criteria

Uses corporate reputation to support causes, organizations, or policies hostile to freedom of expression.

Risk Level

Rationale

Triller created a video titled “Black Music Appreciation Month” that was vaguely supportive of Black Lives Matter but has otherwise avoided ideological issues (1). Otherwise, there are no publicly known cases of the company using its reputation to advance ideological causes or policies (2).

Criteria

Uses corporate funds to advance ideological causes, organizations, or policies hostile to freedom of expression.

Risk Level

Rationale

Triller has not used corporate funds to advance ideological causes, organizations, or policies (1).

Criteria

Uses corporate political actions and/or financial contributions for ideological, non-business purposes.

Risk Level

N/A

Rationale

Triller does not operate a PAC or engage in lobbying at this time (1)(2)(3).

Board Bias

Expand Summary

1792 Exchange has not yet compiled data about the board of directors or political contributions of leadership for this company.