Back to States List

Maine

Maine has one main public pension system: the Maine Public Employees Retirement System (MainePERS).

  • The MainePERS board represents all eligible state and municipal employees; the board consists of 8 members: 1 Ex Officio (State Treasurer); 2 MainePERS members (one of whom is proposed and elected by the Maine Education Association and one of whom is proposed and elected by the Maine State Employees Association); 1 trustee is a PLD member or retiree appointed by the governing body of the Maine Municipal Association; 4 appointed by the Governor. One must be selected by the Governor from a list of nominees submitted by the Maine Retired Teachers Association and one must be a MainePERS retiree selected from a list of nominees submitted by State and/or PLD retirees. The remaining two appointees are direct gubernatorial appointments, both of whom must be qualified through training or experience in investments, accounting, banking, insurance or as actuaries.

Maine PERS uses Glass Lewis for its proxy advisory services.

The “By Asset Manager” and “Asset Manager Voting” tables show the proxy voting records of the state’s asset managers who manage the pensions’ stock market portfolio through index, exchange-traded, or mutual funds. Since these are externally managed funds, the asset managers typically retain and exercise proxy voting privileges. This data is used to calculate the state’s pro-ESG and anti-ESG scores to see how the state leverages its externally managed funds in proxy voting.

The “State Voting” table shows MainePERS proxy voting records for directly owned securities through pension fund portfolios. The 1792 Exchange commends MainePERS for publicly disclosing this information online for its pensioners.

Both tables are important to show a comprehensive picture of the state’s proxy voting record.

By Asset Manager

ACM Funds

Percentage of times Mgr. voted “for” pro-ESG proposals:

0%

BlackRock Funds

Percentage of times Mgr. voted “for” pro-ESG proposals:

7%

Homestead Funds

Percentage of times Mgr. voted “for” pro-ESG proposals:

3%

Invesco Funds

Percentage of times Mgr. voted “for” pro-ESG proposals:

34%

Prudential Funds

Percentage of times Mgr. voted “for” pro-ESG proposals:

38%

Blackstone Funds

Percentage of times Mgr. voted “for” pro-ESG proposals:

84%

Brookfield Funds

Percentage of times Mgr. voted “for” pro-ESG proposals:

48%

Asset Manager Voting

Pro-ESG

17%

Anti-ESG

1.1%

Anti-Fossil Fuels

20%

Anti-Pollution/Waste

29%

Animal Rights

10%

DEI

21%

Weapons/Defense

11%

Human Rights

28%

Income Equality

36%

Political Speech/Lobbying Spending

28%

Health Care

7%

Race/Gender targets on Boards

43%

Non-Pecuniary

8%

ESG-Focused Governance

17%

Abortion

13%

Pro-Fossil Fuel

1%

Equality not DEI

1%

Controversial Cause Support

3%

Geopolitical Rivals/China

2%

State Voting

Pro-ESG

37%

Anti-ESG

2%

Anti-Fossil Fuel

30%

Anti-Pollution/Waste

13%

Animal Rights

0%

DEI

48%

Weapons/Defense

25%

Human Rights

61%

Income Equality

17%

Political Speech/Lobbying Spending

41%

Health Care

5%

Race/Gender targets on Boards

100%

Non-Pecuniary Corporate Purpose

80%

ESG-Focused Governance

22%

Abortion

33%

Pro-Fossil Fuels

0%

Equality not DEI

0%

Controversial Cause Support

14%

Geopolitical Rivals/China

0%

Generate Reports
Clear
Toast