Back to States List

North Carolina

North Carolina directly owned shares for a relatively small number of companies compared to other states that disclose their voting records on directly owned equities. Its Direct Voting averages are not readily comparable to other states’ Direct Voting averages.

The North Carolina Retirement Systems (NCRS) administers the pension benefits for state and local government employees. The NCRS has a sole trustee – the Treasurer of North Carolina. The NCRS specific proxy voting records can be found on this website.

  • The SERS board represents teachers and the LGERS for state employees and local government employees; the board consists of 13 members: 3 Ex Officio (State Treasurer, OSHR Director, State Superintendent); 7 appointed by the Governor; 1 appointed by the Senate President Pro Tempore; 1 appointed by the Speaker of the House.
  • The LGERS board consists of 13 members: 2 Ex Officio (State Treasurer, State Superintendent); 9 appointed by the Governor; 1 appointed by the Senate President Pro Tempore; 1 appointed by the Speaker of the House.

The first table shows the aggregated proxy voting records of the state’s asset managers, who manage the pension’s stock market portfolio either through mutual funds or ETFs, and are therefore exercising proxy voting privileges as well. The second table shows the state’s publicly disclosed proxy voting records for public securities that it directly owns through pension fund portfolios. Both of these tables are necessary to reflect an accurate and comprehensive picture of the state’s proxy voting records.

By Asset Manager

BlackRock Funds

Percentage of times Mgr. voted “for” pro-ESG proposals:

7%

Brown Advisory Funds

Percentage of times Mgr. voted “for” pro-ESG proposals:

29%

Franklin Templeton Funds

Percentage of times Mgr. voted “for” pro-ESG proposals:

51%

North Star Funds

Percentage of times Mgr. voted “for” pro-ESG proposals:

24%

Blackstone Funds

Percentage of times Mgr. voted “for” pro-ESG proposals:

84%

Baillie Gifford Funds

Percentage of times Mgr. voted “for” pro-ESG proposals:

29%

Mondrian Funds

Percentage of times Mgr. voted “for” pro-ESG proposals:

47%

Brookfield Funds

Percentage of times Mgr. voted “for” pro-ESG proposals:

48%

Asset Manager Voting

Pro-ESG

27%

Anti-ESG

22%

Anti-Fossil Fuels

28%

Anti-Pollution/Waste

30%

Animal Rights

9%

DEI

26%

Weapons/Defense

23%

Human Rights

32%

Income Equality

29%

Political Speech/Lobbying Spending

30%

Health Care

19%

Race/Gender targets on Boards

22%

Non-Pecuniary

18%

ESG-Focused Governance

25%

Abortion

20%

Pro-Fossil Fuel

2%

Equality not DEI

2%

Controversial Cause Support

2%

Geopolitical Rivals/China

3%

State Voting

Pro-ESG

23%

Anti-ESG

0%

Anti-Fossil Fuel

17%

Anti-Pollution/Waste

8%

Animal Rights

0%

DEI

46%

Weapons/Defense

50%

Human Rights

37%

Income Equality

0%

Political Speech/Lobbying Spending

20%

Health Care

0%

Race/Gender targets on Boards

N/A

Non-Pecuniary Corporate Purpose

100%

ESG-Focused Governance

0%

Abortion

0%

Pro-Fossil Fuel

0%

Equality not DEI

0%

Controversial Cause Support

N/A

Geopolitical Rivals/China

0%

Generate Reports
Clear
Toast