← All 1792 Insights

Risks Associated with HRC Corporate Partnership

Mitchell Shedd Avatar
Mitchell Shedd
DOWNLOAD
What Is the Human Rights Campaign (HRC)?

The Human Rights Campaign (HRC), functioning as a 501(c)(4), is the largest LGBTQ+ advocacy organization in the United States. Founded as a political action committee in 1980 to support pro-LGBTQ+ candidates, it has since expanded into programs, research, campaigns, lobbying, and mobilization to support and advance pro-LGBTQ+ policies, legislation, and officials.1

What Does the HRC Do?
  • LGBTQ+ issue advocacy and lobbying for LGBTQ+ policy and legislation at the federal, state, and local levels.2
  • Electoral engagement aimed at mobilizing pro-LGBTQ+ voters and supporters to elect pro-LGBTQ+ leaders.3
  • Institutional advocacy to advance LGBTQ+ policies and practices in major systems, including schools, workplaces, hospitals, and communities.4
Risks of Corporate Partnership

Partisan Alignment Risk

  • HRC is a 501(c)(4) advocacy organization involved in lobbying and electoral activity, advancing policy priorities aligned with the Democratic Party platform.5–7 Corporate sponsors have been accused of taking political sides through association.8
  • HRC’s endorsements overwhelmingly favor Democratic candidates, creating a partisan perception.9
  • HRC’s affiliated PAC overwhelmingly funds Democratic candidates, including presidential candidates.10–12
  • Corporate support for the HRC, particularly when not balanced by comparable support for organizations promoting conservative or traditional values, could be perceived as political side-taking.13

Controversial Policy Advocacy

  • HRC’s advocacy extends beyond traditional nondiscrimination policies into highly contested areas of public policy, including ongoing debates related to transgender healthcare, sports participation, and access to sex-based facilities.14,15
  • HRC publishes advocacy-forward resources taking substantive positions on controversial public policy debates.16

Reputational & Stakeholder Risk

  • Activist pressure campaigns have targeted HRC Corporate Partners.17
  • Media coverage has linked companies to HRC advocacy.18
  • Shareholders have criticized companies for their HRC Corporate Partnership.19
  • Corporate logos frequently appear on HRC’s website materials, events, and campaigns, creating implicit brand alignment with HRC advocacy positions—even when companies intend only to support nondiscrimination initiatives.20,21

Market & Peer Risk

  • There is growing caution around corporate affiliation with politically engaged external organizations.22
  • Companies are increasingly withdrawing their HRC Corporate Partnership, with a 38% decrease in sponsorships over the last year.23
27 companies have withdrawn their HRC corporate partnership in the last year.24
Companies that have withdrawn Barclays, Caesars Entertainment, Capital One, Cargill, Chevron, Citi, Comcast NBCUniversal, Cox Enterprises, CVS, Danaher, Danone, Deloitte, Eaton, Exelon, Goldman Sachs, Google, Hershey, Intel, Johnson & Johnson, Lexus, NMG, Nordstrom, PepsiCo, PNC, Ross, T-Mobile, United Airlines, Visa, and Whirlpool.

Related Insights

Insights

HRC Launches Educators for Equality Pledge

HRC
August 13, 2026

As a new school year rolls around, the Human Rights Campaign (HRC) launched a new pledge focused on recruiting educators to commit to “ensure every student feels safe, valued, and affirmed.” This Educators for Equality pledge, among other things, asks signatories to:  This initiative fits squarely within HRC’s existing work in schools via its Welcoming Schools program, an “anti-bullying” curriculum that functions as a subversive way to discuss LGBTQ+ topics in the classroom. If that accusation feels like an assertion, consider the fact that the “key resources” HRC highlighted in the pledge sign-up are “pioneering LGBTQ+ and gender-inclusive professional development training, lesson plans, booklists and school advocacy resources specifically designed for educators and youth-serving professionals.”  For example, an “Educator for Equality” might use the Welcoming Schools curriculum to teach 3rd graders about the “Gendersnow Person” as a way to “explore the concepts of gender identity and gender expression” and that there are “many ways to be a girl, boy, both or neither.”  Even a cursory journey through the Welcoming Schools website will clarify HRC’s obsession with getting our schools to focus on modern gender ideology rather than academic excellence. Its School Board Guide is for parents, teachers, and “concerned community member[s]” to learn how to effectively advocate for LGBTQ+ policies, “organize and build power” in their local communities, and hold their school board members “to a higher standard.” Its Self-Care guide provides LGBTQ+ youth with resources to find community support, including TrevorSpace, an online chatroom that allows adults to communicate with minors about LGBTQ+ topics. Adults in …

Read More
Insights
Op-Ed

Schwab and Walmart get it right on not covering “gender transitions” for minors

CEI HRC Protecting Children
July 28, 2026

Consider the millions of working parents who show up every day at their jobs, work hard to support their families and pay into their company’s healthcare plans. They trust that their premiums will fund genuine medical care, not repeat one of medicine’s darkest mistakes. In our not-so-distant past, frontal lobotomies were performed to “treat” psychiatric conditions — despite limited evidence of effectiveness. The operations had devastating long-term effects and no proven medical benefit. It was not long before the world realized what a serious mistake was being committed and put a stop to this abusive “treatment.” Today’s unproven “gender-affirming” interventions on minors use surgery, hormones and puberty blockers to address a mental health condition with similarly irreversible consequences: permanent sterilization, the removal of healthy organs and lifelong physical and emotional damage. No responsible modern healthcare plan would cover frontal lobotomies, yet many quietly fund these experimental sex-denying procedures on children. Let us not repeat that shameful history on our gender-dysphoric youths. This is not healthcare. These are not medically necessary procedures. These are not minor adjustments or reversible treatments. They are costly, permanently damaging experiments on our children, who lack the maturity and legal capacity to count the cost of …

Read More
Insights
List

550+ Companies Covering Sex-Denying Procedures for Minor Dependents

CEI HRC LGBTQ+ Protecting Children
July 28, 2026

According to February 2026 data from the Human Rights Campaign, 550+ companies provide health insurance coverage for transgender medical interventions, including puberty blockers, hormones, and surgical procedures, to covered minor dependents through their employee health plans. HRC reports this information after a corporate representative uses an online HRC portal to upload, or affirm a previously uploaded copy of, the company’s Summary Plan Description (SPD) or Summary of Material Modification (SMM) that explicitly shows coverage for transition-related care. The representative must also upload a copy of the company’s applicable clinical guidelines (medical policy). These companies range from major financial institutions and law firms to retailers, insurers, and tech giants. Shareholders, customers, parents, and employees deserve to know where their companies stand. 1792 Exchange calls on every company on this list to adopt clear protections for minor dependents in their healthcare plans and get back to business. A&O Shearman Adaptive Biotechnologies Corporation Billtrust Box Inc. Griffith Foods Group Hanover Insurance Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield of New Jersey HSBC Holdings Linklaters Mayer Brown MERGE Moderna Neuberger Berman Group NTT DATA Services NTT Global Data Centers Americas PGA TOUR Publicis Health Publicis Media Sony Interactive Entertainment Sony Music Sony Pictures Steptoe Sutherland Global …

Read More
Insights
Referenced

Professionals Are Betting Less on Identity Politics for Career Advancement

CEI HRC LGBTQ+
July 20, 2026

“It’s interesting to see activist groups openly confess to exploiting sexual and gender identity to get ahead in the workplace. But even more interesting is that the most radical ideologues are now admitting that the spell is wearing off,” 1792 Exchange executive vice president Greg Scott told the DCNF. The 1792 Exchange is a nonprofit whose mission “is ‘helping businesses get back to business’ by influencing American companies to advance principles including free speech, freedom of religion, and free enterprise,” according to its website. “Many companies have seen that taking sides in political battles presents few benefits and carries intolerable reputational risk. It’s not speculation or mere vibing to say that businesses are increasingly getting back to business and leaving the culture wars behind,” Scott said. Scott told the DCNF that 65% of Fortune 500 companies stopped participating in the Human Rights Campaign (HRC)’s Corporate Equality Index survey in one year. He also said that HRC lost half its annual dinner sponsors in one year. “These are just two indicators that many businesses are renewing their commitment to serve all their customers, shareholders, and employees, rather than bow the knee to special interests,” Scott said. The full article can be found in Daily Caller.

Read More
Insights
Brief

Risks Associated with HRC Foundation Partnership

CEI HRC
July 17, 2026

What Is the Human Rights Campaign Foundation (HRCF)? The Human Rights Campaign Foundation (HRCF) is the educational and charitable affiliate of the Human Rights Campaign, operating as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization. HRCF advances LGBTQ+ priorities through research, resources, benchmarking tools, programs, and public education intended to shape policies and practices across workplaces, municipalities, healthcare systems, schools, and other institutions.1,2 What Does the HRCF Do? Administers an annual Corporate Equality Index (CEI), which evaluates companies based on workforce protections, benefits, culture, and outreach and engagement related to LGBTQ+ issues.3–5 Administers an annual Municipal Equality Index (MEI), which evaluates cities based on their non-discrimination laws, benefits, contractor standards, municipal services, law enforcement, and local leadership related to LGBTQ+ issues.6–8 Administers a biannual Healthcare Equality Index (HEI), which evaluates hospitals and healthcare facilities based on their training, patient services, employee benefits and policies, community engagement, and responsible citizenship related to LGBTQ+ issues.9,10 Operates a Welcoming Schools program that provides LGBTQ+ training, lesson plans, booklists, in-person training/programming, and other resources for youth-serving professionals to create “gender-inclusive” schools and support transgender and non-binary students.11–15 Risks of Corporate Partnership Partisan Alignment Risk HRCF’s programs promote policy frameworks and institutional standards widely associated with progressive policy priorities.16,17 …

Read More
Insights

HRC National Dinner Sponsorships Plummet 54.5% 

CEI HRC
July 16, 2026

The Human Rights Campaign is currently recruiting sponsors for its 2026 National Dinner, and its sponsorship materials provide a revealing comparison. Because these advertisements list sponsors from the previous year, 1792 Exchange was able to compare the 2024 and 2025 National Dinner sponsor rosters. The result: HRC National Dinner sponsorships have declined by 54.5%.  This sharp decrease fits a broader pattern. HRC corporate sponsorships fell 38% from 2024 to 2025, while participation in the organization’s Corporate Equality Index among Fortune 1000 companies declined 61% from 2025 to 2026.  These developments are especially notable because corporate sponsorship of the HRC/HRCF and their events and participation in the CEI had historically moved in only one direction: upward. That trajectory began to change following Tractor Supply’s June 2024 apology, when it became the first major company to publicly distance itself from both the HRC and the CEI.   However, this decline did not occur in isolation. A dedicated group of organizations, investors, and journalists has increasingly exposed the extent of the HRC’s influence over corporate policies and practices. At the same time, a broader cultural, political, and legal movement has challenged DEI programs and corporate support for modern gender ideology. Together, these developments have brought the reputational, legal, …

Read More