Susman Godfrey LLP

Texas
Legal

Corporate Bias Rating

Expand Summary

Risk Level:

Rating - Caution
Medium Risk

Summary:

Susman Godfrey often yields to political activism in shaping corporate governance, potentially alienating consumers, dividing employees, and harming shareholders. The company implements race and identity-based policies that replace merit, excellence, and integrity with preferential treatment and outcomes. Susan Godfrey occasionally embraces corporate initiatives that redirect its central focus from business goals to partisan policies and divisive issues at times. This approach fails to safeguard free exercise, free speech, and free enterprise.

View Full Corporate Bias Ratings Report
Criteria
Risk Level
Rationale
Corporate Weaponization
Criteria

Has canceled customers, suppliers, or vendors due to their political views or religious beliefs OR corporately boycotts, divests, or sanctions regions, people groups, or industries.

Risk Level
Rationale

Susman Godfrey has not publicly canceled customers, suppliers, or vendors based on political views or religious beliefs (1).

Criteria

Charitable giving (including employee matching programs) policies or practices discriminate against charitable organizations based on views or religious beliefs.

Risk Level
N/A
Rationale

Susman Godfrey does not publish charitable giving guidelines (1).

Criteria

Employment policies fail to protect against viewpoint or other discrimination and/or are ideological in nature.

Risk Level
Rationale

Susman Godfrey received a letter from the American Alliance for Equal Rights (AAFER), demanding its diversity fellowship stop using race as a determining factor of who qualifies for the program. AAFER did not file a lawsuit because the firm made “substantial changes” to its fellowship (1)(2)(3)(4). Susman Godfrey offered systemic racism workshops and seminars for its employees (5). Susman Godfrey does not provide viewpoint protections for its employees (6).

Corporate Governance and Public Policy
Criteria

Uses corporate reputation to support causes, organizations, or policies hostile to freedom of expression.

Risk Level
Rationale

In the wake of George Floyd’s death, Susman Godfrey published a statement about systemic racism (1). Otherwise, the company has not supported ideological causes or policies (2).

Criteria

Uses corporate funds to advance ideological causes, organizations, or policies hostile to freedom of expression.

Risk Level
Rationale

Susman Godfrey provides a benefits package for employees that covers travel/lodging costs for an abortion (1). In 2020, Susman Godfrey pledged to match employee donations to organizations focused on racial justice. The firm also dedicated 100% of its charitable contributions toward racial justice organizations, including the Equal Justice Initiative and the Center for Antiracist Research at Boston University (2)(3)(4).

Criteria

Uses corporate political actions and/or financial contributions for ideological, non-business purposes.

Risk Level
Rationale

Susman Godfrey is a partner of the Center for Reproductive Rights, building case law, advocating before policy makers, and engaging in litigation to challenge bans and restrictions on access to abortion (1). Susman Godfrey does not operate a PAC or engage in lobbying at this time (2)(3)(4).

Board Bias

Expand Summary

1792 Exchange has not yet compiled data about the board of directors or political contributions of leadership for this company.

Generate Reports
Clear
Toast