Elevance Health
Corporate Bias Rating
Expand Summary
Risk Level:
Summary:
Elevance Health is High Risk. The company yields to political activism in shaping corporate governance, potentially alienating consumers, dividing employees, and harming shareholders. The company implements race and identity-based policies that replace merit, excellence, and integrity with preferential treatment and outcomes. Elevance Health embraces corporate initiatives that redirect its central focus from business goals to partisan policies and divisive issues. This approach fails to safeguard free exercise, free speech, and free enterprise.
View Full Corporate Bias Ratings ReportBoard Bias
Expand Summary
CEO of Elevance Health
Gail K. Boudreaux
Summary:
Headquartered in Indianapolis, Indiana, Elevance Health is a member of the Fortune 250 operating in the Health Care Equipment and Services industry. Gail K. Boudreaux and Elizabeth E. Tallett serve as CEO/President and Chairman, respectively, leading the company’s C-suite executive team and the board of directors. Amongst these teams, the collective leadership is responsible for $154,350 to Republican causes and $75,971 to Democratic causes. Under their tenure, Elevance Health currently holds a 'High Risk' risk rating.
View Full Board Bias ReportPolitical Contributions of Leadership:
$154,350
$75,971
Republican
Democrat
Shareholder Proposals
Expand Summary
Date | ESG Category | Proponent | Summary of Resolution | Mgmt Rec | Total Vote % in Favor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
5/15/24 | Governance | Nathan Cummings Foundation | Third-Party Spending Due Diligence Proposal | Against | 5.08% |
5/10/23 | Governance | John Chevedden | Give the Owners of 10% of Common Stock the Power to Call a Special Shareholder Meeting | Against | 46.00% |
5/10/23 | Governance | Nathan Cummings Foundation | Require Indirect Political Spending Reporting | Against | 8.10% |
5/18/22 | Social | Trillium Asset Management | Racial Impact Audit and Report | Against | 41.24% |
5/18/22 | Social | John Harrington | Adopt a Policy Prohibiting Direct and Indirect Political Contributions to Candidates | Against | 4.01% |