Kroger

Harris Teeter, Fred Meyer, Vitacost, King Soopers, City Market, Fry's, Gerbes, Ralphs, Home Chef
Ohio
Food and Staples Retailing

Corprate Bias Ratings

Risk Level:

Rating - Danger
High Risk

Kroger fired two Christian employees who requested not to wear the gay pride logo on their work aprons. Kroger vets vendors according to LGBTQ policies and does not provide its employees with protections against viewpoint discrimination. The company covers the cost of "medically necessary transition-related care" for its employees and their children. Kroger pledged $13 million to BLM and related causes and covers travel costs for employee abortions. Kroger uses its reputation and corporate dollars to fund LGBT causes and organizations. For these reasons, Kroger receives a High Risk rating.

Criteria
Risk Level
Rationale
Corporate Weaponization
Criteria

Has denied service to customers, suppliers, or vendors due to their political views or religious beliefs OR corporately boycotts, divests, or sanctions regions, people groups, or industries.

Risk Level
Rationale

Kroger fired two Christian employees who opted not to wear the rainbow logo emblematic of LGBTQ pride (1). Kroger received a score of 100 on the Corporate Equality Index from the Human Rights Campaign (HRC). Among other requirements, this means the company has pledged to vet vendors based on LGBTQ policies (2).

Criteria

Charitable giving (including employee matching programs) policies or practices discriminate against charitable organizations based on views or religious beliefs.

Risk Level
Rationale

Kroger will not provide employee matching grants to churches or religious organizations (1). Harris Teeter will not donate to political or religious organizations on the basis that the company cannot “fund drives conducted by religious or political organizations” (2).

Criteria

Employment policies fail to protect against discrimination based on political affiliation/views and/or religion.

Risk Level
Rationale

Kroger does not provide viewpoint protections for its employees (1).

Corporate Governance and Public Policy
Criteria

Uses corporate reputation to support ideological causes and/or organizations hostile to freedom of expression.

Risk Level
Rationale

The company has advocated for the Equality Act and told employees to do the same (1). Kroger has encouraged employees to support the Human Rights Campaign (HRC) and the Gay, Lesbian, and Straight Education Network (2). Kroger partners with the National Gay and Lesbian Chamber of Commerce (3). Kroger created a PRIDE month collection and uses its PRIDE Associate Resource Group to create an LGBTQ allyship guide (4). Harris Teeter and Kroger partner with the National Gay and Lesbian Chamber of Commerce (5). Harris Teeter created a PRIDE month collection with several suppliers “to inform, educate and uplift both the LGBTQ community and potential future allies” (6).

Criteria

Uses corporate funds to advance ideological causes, organizations, or policies hostile to freedom of expression.

Risk Level
Rationale

Kroger has a perfect score on the HRC’s 2022 Corporate Equality Index. This score indicates the company covers the cost of “medically necessary transition-related care” for its employees and their children (1)(2). Kroger funds the National LGBT Chamber of Commerce and enables community donations to Planned Parenthood (3)(4). Kroger also announced it would fund travel expenses for its employees to get an abortion (5). Kroger pledged $13 million to the Black Lives Matter movement and related causes (6)(7)(8). Harris Teeter’s supplier-driven Pride collection included an offering of limited-edition Vizzy hard seltzer produced in partnership with the Human Rights Campaign (HRC) (9).

Criteria

Uses corporate political contributions for ideological, non-business purposes.

Risk Level
Rationale

Kroger has not used its PAC donations for ideological purposes (1)(2).

 

All links were last accessed and all information was updated on:
December 5, 2023

Company reports are intended for educational use only. Full Disclaimer

Voting History

Date
ESG Category
Proponent
Summary of ResolutionMgmt RecTotal Vote % in Favor
6/22/23SocialArjuna CapitalReport on Racial and Gender Pay GapsAgainst51.60%
6/22/23EnvironmentalAs You SowRecyclability of PackagingAgainst31.60%
6/22/23SocialSisters of St. Francis of PhiladelphiaReport on Public Health Costs from Sale of Tobacco ProductsAgainst12.60%
6/22/23SocialLouis B. and Diana R. Eichold TrustListing of Charitable Contributions $10,000 or MoreAgainst6.60%
6/22/23GovernanceNational Center for Public Policy ResearchReport on EEO Policy RisksAgainst1.90%
6/23/22EnvironmentalAs You SowReport on Efforts to Reduce Plastic UseAgainst38.37%
6/23/22EnvironmentalFriends Fiduciary Corp.Report on Efforts to Eliminate HFCs (Hydrofluorocarbons) in Refrigeration and Reduce GHG EmissionsAgainst35.40%
6/23/22SocialSisters of the Presentation of BVMReport on Risks to Buisness Due to Increased Labor Market PressureAgainst29.53%
6/23/22SocialDomini Impact InvestmentsReport on Human Rights and Protection of FarmworkersAgainst20.85%
Generate Reports
Clear
Toast

This website stores cookies on your computer. These cookies are used to collect information about how you interact with our website and allow us to remember you. We use this information in order to improve and customize your browsing experience and for analytics and metrics about our visitors both on this website and other media. To find out more about the cookies we use, see our Privacy Policy.

Accept