Genpact
Companies who are members of the OneTen Coalition, appearing to prioritize diversity over merit in their business practices
Rating Overview
Rating Criteria
Rating Criteria Detail
Corporate Weaponization
Criteria:
Has canceled customers, suppliers, or vendors due to their political views or religious beliefs OR corporately boycotts, divests, or sanctions regions, people groups, or industries.
Risk Level:
MediumCriteria:
Charitable giving (including employee matching programs) policies or practices discriminate against charitable organizations based on views or religious beliefs.
Risk Level:
LowerRationale:
Genpact does not appear to discriminate against charitable organizations based on views or beliefs. Genpact’s charitable giving focus areas are health and well-being, education, and the environment (1).
Criteria:
Employment policies fail to protect against viewpoint or other discrimination and/or are ideological in nature.
Risk Level:
HighRationale:
Genpact offers an allyship program for its employees (1). Genpact is a signatory of the Gender & Diversity KPI Alliance, appearing to prioritize diversity over merit in its business structure through the establishment of gender and racial targets for its leadership composition and its support of DEI in its hiring and promotions (2)(3). Genpact does not provide viewpoint protections for its employees (4).
Corporate Governance and Public Policy
Criteria:
Uses corporate reputation to support causes, organizations, or policies hostile to freedom of expression.
Risk Level:
HighRationale:
Genpact is aiming to reach net zero emissions by 2050, submitting its “goals for validation by the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi)” (1). Genpact wrote an article promoting the integration of ESG into business practices titled, “Embedding ESG in your organization’s DNA: Challenges and solutions” (2). Genpact CEO Tiger Tyagarajan wrote a piece on the effects of systemic racism (3). Genpact wrote an article that discussed how to mitigate unconscious bias in technical design (4).
Criteria:
Uses corporate funds to advance ideological causes, organizations, or policies hostile to freedom of expression.
Risk Level:
Medium