Johnson & Johnson
Companies who scored 100% on the 2023-2024 Corporate Equality Index.
Companies who scored 100% on the 2025 Corporate Equality Index.
Companies provide a benefit package for employees which covers travel/lodging costs for an abortion.
Company is a corporate partner of Ashoka, a global network of entrepreneurs focused on widespread, systemic social and environmental change
Companies who signed the Business Roundtable 2019 Stakeholder Capitalism statement
The biggest 1000 U.S. companies by revenue according to form 10-K.
Companies who were members of the Global Alliance for Responsible Media, which subjectively demonetized advertisements and suppressed content to stifle mainstream perspectives online
Companies who are members of the OneTen Coalition, appearing to prioritize diversity over merit in their business practices
Companies who are/were a corporate partner of the The Trevor Project, an organization that advocates for controversial sex and gender ideology, including for children.
Companies that offer so-called transgender healthcare for their employees and covered dependents.
Rating Overview
Rating Criteria
Rating Criteria Detail
Corporate Weaponization
Criteria:
Has canceled customers, suppliers, or vendors due to their political views or religious beliefs OR corporately boycotts, divests, or sanctions regions, people groups, or industries.
Risk Level:
MediumRationale:
J&J received a score of 100 on the 2025 Corporate Equality Index (CEI) from the Human Rights Campaign (HRC), a political stakeholder group. The company recruits employees based on sexual identity issues. The company discriminates against vendors that do not promote divisive sex and gender policies, indicating it prioritizes sexual issues over merit (1)(2). The company was a member of the GARM, a global media alliance that frequently demonetized and suppressed conservative content online. However, in April 2025, J&J pledged political and religious neutrality in its advertising (3)(4)(5)(6)(7). The company integrates ESG into its business practices. From its Responsibility Standards for Suppliers: The company expects its suppliers to “Establish and publicly report at least annually on science-based greenhouse gas emissions reduction goals” (8). The company promotes divisive sex and gender policies. Its Responsibility Standards for Suppliers require international vendors to include sexual orientation and gender identity in their nondiscrimination policy (9). However, the company has not publicly canceled customers, suppliers, or vendors based on political views or religious beliefs (10).
Criteria:
Charitable giving (including employee matching programs) policies or practices discriminate against charitable organizations based on views or religious beliefs.
Risk Level:
HighCriteria:
Employment policies fail to protect against viewpoint or other discrimination and/or are ideological in nature.
Risk Level:
HighRationale:
J&J’s HRC 2025 CEI rating indicates the company forces employees to attend multiple, controversial trainings on gender identity, sexual orientation, transgender issues, and divisive racial ideology. The company provides gender transition guidelines for its employees and a specific benefits guide with a comprehensive explanation of transgender services funded by the company (1)(2). It rolled out global unconscious bias training for all its employees (3). In June 2025 America First Legal filed a letter with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Office of Civil Rights requesting a civil rights investigation into Johnson & Johnson over discriminatory practices in its supply chain and hiring (4). The company does not provide viewpoint protections for its employees (5).
Corporate Governance and Public Policy
Criteria:
Uses corporate reputation to support causes, organizations, or policies hostile to freedom of expression.
Risk Level:
HighRationale:
J&J‘s HRC 2025 CEI rating indicates the company agrees to allow a controversial stakeholder group focused on sexual identity issues to dictate marketing or advertising strategy. By doing so, the company risks dividing employees, alienating customers and harming shareholders (1)(2). The company is a founding member of the PGLE which is an LGBTIQ+ equality and inclusion advocacy group. This reflects J&J’s commitment to “operationalize” company coverage of transgender surgery and treatment, the vetting of business partners based on LGBTQ+ policies, and the financial support of LGBTQ organizations on a global level (3)(4). It signed an open letter endorsing the Equality Act, a contentious proposal to amend the 1964 Civil Rights Act by adding sexual orientation and so-called gender identity as protected categories. The legislation would, among other implications, grant biological men access to women-only spaces such as sports teams and public restrooms, and compel healthcare providers to deliver sex-denying healthcare (5). The company opposed various state and local legislation intended to protect parental rights, girls’ sports, bathroom facilities, and gendered spaces (6)(7). It spoke out against the Georgia voting integrity legislation (8). The company opposed legislation in Iowa intended to protect parental rights, girls’ sports, bathroom facilities, and gendered spaces (9). The company opposed the Florida Parental Rights in Education Act, which would prohibit teaching gender identity and sexual orientation to kids in K-3rd grade (10). The company’s CEO Joaquin Duato is a member of the Business Roundtable and Former CEO Alex Gorsky signed its 2019 Statement on the Purpose of a Corporation, which promotes stakeholder capitalism over traditional obligations to shareholders (11)(12). J&J’s CEO, signed the CEO Action for Diversity & Inclusion pledge, which includes a commitment to promote DEI through bias education training in the workplace (13)(14).
Criteria:
Uses corporate funds to advance ideological causes, organizations, or policies hostile to freedom of expression.
Risk Level:
HighRationale:
J&J provides a benefits package for employees that covers travel/lodging costs for an abortion and transgender medical procedures for covered employees and dependents, including children (1)(2)(3). The company‘s HRC 2025 CEI rating indicates the company covers transgender related costs for its employees and their children, including paid short-term leave, puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, chest surgeries, genital surgeries, medical visits and lab monitoring, travel and lodging. Additionally, the company has pledged philanthropic support of at least one organization or event that promotes sex and gender ideology. By allowing a political stakeholder group to dictate operations, the company increases health care costs and risks dividing employees, alienating customers and harming shareholders (4)(5). The company was a member of the GARM, a global media alliance that frequently demonetized and suppressed conservative content online. However, in April 2025, J&J pledged political and religious neutrality in its advertising (6)(7)(8)(9)(10). The company was a Bronze Tier corporate sponsor of the Trevor Project, an organization that advocates for controversial sex and gender ideology, including “gender transition” drugs and surgeries for minors, through legislation, litigation, advertising, and PR campaigns. The organization also hosts online chatrooms that allow adults to communicate with minors as young as 13 about sexually explicit topics. Adults in these chatrooms have encouraged minors to adopt transgender identities and withhold this information from their parents (11)(12)(13)(14)(15). The company was a bronze sponsor of the HRC and a corporate partner of the NGLCC (16)(17). It has a matching gift program to Planned Parenthood and has pledged $10 million over a span of three years to the BLM and/or related racial equity causes (18)(19)(20). The company is a member of the MCCA, indicating its focus on recruiting, retaining, and promoting employees based on race (21)(22). It is a coalition member of OneTen, appearing to prioritize diversity over merit in its hiring (23)(24)(25). Johnson & Johnson and Johnson & Johnson Foundation is a corporate partner of Ashoka, a global network of entrepreneurs focused on widespread, systemic social and environmental change (26)(27). Otherwise, there are no publicly known cases of the company using corporate funds to advance ideological causes, organizations, or policies (28).
Criteria:
Uses corporate political actions and/or financial contributions for ideological, non-business purposes.
Risk Level:
HighRationale:
J&J‘s HRC 2025 CEI rating indicates the company publicly advocated for controversial sex and gender ideology through local, state or federal legislation or initiatives. By allowing a political stakeholder group to dictate operations, the company risks dividing employees, alienating customers and harming shareholders (1)(2). The company donated to the Equality PAC and has lobbied for the Equality Act (3)(4)(5).