MGE Energy, Inc.

Industries Energy
Activism

The biggest 3000 companies in the U.S. in the year of 2025.

Rating Overview

Risk Rating: Medium

MGE Energy, Inc. is Medium Risk.

MGE Energy is Medium Risk. The company often yields to political activism in shaping corporate governance, potentially alienating consumers, dividing employees, and harming shareholders. The company implements race and identity-based policies that replace merit, excellence, and integrity with preferential treatment and outcomes. The company occasionally embraces corporate initiatives that redirect its central focus from business goals to partisan policies and divisive issues at times. This approach fails to safeguard free exercise, free speech, and free enterprise.

Rating Criteria

Corporate Weaponization Risk Levels
Criteria Risk Level
Cancellations Medium Risk
Discriminatory Philanthropy Lower Risk
Employment Protection High Risk

Corporate Weaponization

Corporate Governance and Public Policy Risk Levels
Criteria Risk Level
Advocacy Bias Medium Risk
Funding Lower Risk
Political Actions No Data

Corporate Governance and Public Policy

Rating Criteria Detail

Criteria Risk Level Rationale

Corporate Weaponization


Criteria:

Has canceled customers, suppliers, or vendors due to their political views or religious beliefs OR corporately boycotts, divests, or sanctions regions, people groups, or industries.

Risk Level:

Medium

Rationale:

MGE Energy integrates ESG into its business practices. From its 2025 CSR Report: “MGE Energy’s Board of Directors’ Human Resources and Compensation Committee, composed of independent directors, takes into consideration performance on both short- and long-term corporate strategy, among other factors, when evaluating executive compensation. Directors consider environmental performance, among other factors” (1). However, the company has not canceled customers, suppliers, or vendors based on political views or religious beliefs (2).

Criteria:

Charitable giving (including employee matching programs) policies or practices discriminate against charitable organizations based on views or religious beliefs.

Risk Level:

Lower

Rationale:

MGE Energy does not appear to discriminate against charitable organizations based on views or beliefs (1).

Criteria:

Employment policies fail to protect against viewpoint or other discrimination and/or are ideological in nature.

Risk Level:

High

Rationale:

MGE Energy appears to prioritize diversity over merit in its leadership composition. From its Corporate Governance Guidelines: “The candidate review criteria include characteristics such as integrity, business experience, knowledge, and independence of judgment, as well as diversity in business backgrounds in order to bring different experiences and perspectives to the Board. Diversity in personal background, race, gender, age, and nationality, for the Board as a whole, may be taken into account in considering candidates” (1). The company does not provide viewpoint protections for its employees (2).

Corporate Governance and Public Policy


Criteria:

Uses corporate reputation to support causes, organizations, or policies hostile to freedom of expression.

Risk Level:

Medium

Rationale:

MGE Energy supports ESG within its business practices. From its 2025 CSR Report: “MGE also participates in the Edison Electric Institute’s (EEI) and American Gas Association’s (AGA) environmental, social and governance (ESG)/sustainability-related reporting quantitative template” (1). The company is working to net zero carbon electricity by 2050 (2). Otherwise, MGE Energy has not supported ideological causes or policies (3).

Criteria:

Uses corporate funds to advance ideological causes, organizations, or policies hostile to freedom of expression.

Risk Level:

Lower

Rationale:

MGE Energy has not used corporate funds to advance ideological causes, organizations, or policies (1).

Criteria:

Uses corporate political actions and/or financial contributions for ideological, non-business purposes.

Risk Level:

N/A

Rationale:

MGE Energy does not operate a PAC or engage in lobbying at this time (1)(2)(3).