New Balance
Rating Overview
Rating Criteria
Rating Criteria Detail
Corporate Weaponization
Criteria:
Has canceled customers, suppliers, or vendors due to their political views or religious beliefs OR corporately boycotts, divests, or sanctions regions, people groups, or industries.
Risk Level:
LowerRationale:
New Balance has not publicly canceled customers, suppliers, or vendors based on political views or religious beliefs (1).
Criteria:
Charitable giving (including employee matching programs) policies or practices discriminate against charitable organizations based on views or religious beliefs.
Risk Level:
MediumRationale:
New Balance’s charitable giving guidelines require that organizations abide by its nondiscrimination policy including on the basis of sexual orientation, thereby excluding some religious charities (1).
Criteria:
Employment policies fail to protect against viewpoint or other discrimination and/or are ideological in nature.
Risk Level:
LowerRationale:
New Balance protects its employees against viewpoint discrimination (1).
Corporate Governance and Public Policy
Criteria:
Uses corporate reputation to support causes, organizations, or policies hostile to freedom of expression.
Risk Level:
HighRationale:
New Balance supports GLSEN’s Changing the Game Initiative, which “advanc[e] the acceptance of LGBTQIA+ youth in athletics” (1). In 2021, the company released a Pride Collection and a short film telling the story of the Front Runners New York Pride Run (2). It is a member of the UN’s Fashion Industry Charter for Climate Action, committed to net zero by 2050 (3)(4).
Criteria:
Uses corporate funds to advance ideological causes, organizations, or policies hostile to freedom of expression.
Risk Level:
HighRationale:
From 2022 to 2025, New Balance will donate $600,000 to support GLSEN’s Changing the Game initiative. The company was also a sponsor of the Front Runners New York LGBT Pride Run in 2022 (1). Otherwise, there are no publicly known cases of the company using corporate funds to advance ideological causes, organizations, or policies (2).