Sprinklr - 1792 Exchange

Rating Overview

Sprinklr is Medium Risk.

Sprinklr, Inc. is Medium Risk. The company often yields to political activism in shaping corporate governance, potentially alienating consumers, dividing employees, and harming shareholders. The company implements race and identity-based policies that replace merit, excellence, and integrity with preferential treatment and outcomes. The company occasionally embraces corporate initiatives that redirect its central focus from business goals to partisan policies and divisive issues at times. This approach fails to safeguard free exercise, free speech, and free enterprise.

Rating Criteria

Corporate Weaponization Risk Levels
Criteria	Risk Level
Cancellations	No Data
Discriminatory Philanthropy	Lower Risk
Employment Protection	High Risk

Corporate Weaponization ⓘ

Corporate Governance and Public Policy Risk Levels
Criteria	Risk Level
Advocacy Bias	High Risk
Funding	Lower Risk
Political Actions	No Data

Corporate Governance and Public Policy ⓘ

Rating Criteria Detail

Criteria Risk Level Rationale

Corporate Weaponization

Criteria:

Has canceled customers, suppliers, or vendors due to their political views or religious beliefs OR corporately boycotts, divests, or sanctions regions, people groups, or industries.

Risk Level:

N/A

Rationale:

Sprinklr integrates ESG into its business practices. From its Sustainability Page: “We recognize our corporate responsibility to implement and support a high standard of ethical and environmentally responsible business practices. Our ESG strategy is based on a sustainability model with three pillars: Environment, Social, and Governance.” (1). The company promotes divisive sex and gender policies. Its Supplier Code of Conduct requires international vendors to include sexual orientation in their nondiscrimination policy (2). However, Sprinklr has not canceled customers, suppliers, or vendors based on political views or religious beliefs (3).

Criteria:

Charitable giving (including employee matching programs) policies or practices discriminate against charitable organizations based on views or religious beliefs.

Risk Level:

Lower

Rationale:

Sprinklr does not appear to discriminate against charitable organizations based on views or beliefs (1)(2).

Criteria:

Employment policies fail to protect against viewpoint or other discrimination and/or are ideological in nature.

Risk Level:

High

Rationale:

Sprinklr offers unconscious bias and DEI training to its employees (1). The company does not provide viewpoint protections for its employees (2)(3).

Corporate Governance and Public Policy

Criteria:

Uses corporate reputation to support causes, organizations, or policies hostile to freedom of expression.

Risk Level:

High

Rationale:

Sprinklr supports DEI within its business practices. From its Career Page: “We believe that diversity, equity, and inclusion are more than what is right; they are what is best for business.” (1). From its 2025 Annual Report: “We consider several measures and objectives in managing our human capital assets, including, among others,… inclusion and belonging” (2). The company supports ESG within its business practices. From its ESG Impact Report: “We recognize our corporate responsibility to implement and support a high standard of ethical and responsible business practices. As a result, we have developed an advisory team that leads our Environmental, Social, and Governance (“ESG”) program and drives these initiatives company-wide. ” (3).

Criteria:

Uses corporate funds to advance ideological causes, organizations, or policies hostile to freedom of expression.

Risk Level:

Lower

Rationale:

Sprinklr has not used corporate funds to advance ideological causes, organizations, or policies (1).

Criteria:

Uses corporate political actions and/or financial contributions for ideological, non-business purposes.

Risk Level:

N/A

Rationale:

Sprinklr does not operate a PAC or report on its lobbying at this time (1)(2)(3).