Ring

California
Technology Hardware and Equipment

Corprate Bias Ratings

Risk Level:

Rating - Clear
Lower Risk

Ring, which specializes in security hardware for homes, has not publicly terminated business relationships due to religious or political beliefs. Ring was acquired by Amazon in 2018. Ring does not protect employees from viewpoint discrimination. It has not used its reputation or corporate dollars to support groups or agendas hostile to freedom of expression. For these reasons, Ring receives a "Lower Risk" rating.

Criteria
Risk Level
Rationale
Corporate Weaponization
Criteria

Has denied service to customers, suppliers, or vendors due to their political views or religious beliefs OR corporately boycotts, divests, or sanctions regions, people groups, or industries.

Risk Level
Rationale

Ring has not publicly terminated business relationships due to religious or political beliefs.

Criteria

Charitable giving (including employee matching programs) policies or practices discriminate against charitable organizations based on views or religious beliefs.

Risk Level
Rationale

The organization states that it works “with various local and national community-oriented organizations to better understand and support community safety efforts. We work exclusively with 501(c)(3) organizations that are aligned with Ring’s mission to help make neighborhoods safer. Ring’s donations are also designed to offer support for non-governmental organizations” (1). It does not state if religious organizations are included; however, it does donate to Habitat for Humanity, a faith-based charity.

Criteria

Employment policies fail to protect against discrimination based on political affiliation/views and/or religion.

Risk Level
Rationale

Ring does not protect employees from viewpoint discrimination (1).

Corporate Governance and Public Policy
Criteria

Uses corporate reputation to support ideological causes and/or organizations hostile to freedom of expression.

Risk Level
Rationale

Ring has not publicly used its corporate reputation to advance ideological causes, policies, or organizations hostile to freedom of expression.

Criteria

Uses corporate funds to advance ideological causes, organizations, or policies hostile to freedom of expression.

Risk Level
Rationale

There are no publicly known instances of Ring donating to ideological groups hostile to freedom of expression.

Criteria

Uses corporate political contributions for ideological, non-business purposes.

Risk Level
N/A
Rationale

Ring does not operate a PAC.

All links were last accessed and all information was updated on:
March 23, 2023

Company reports are intended for educational use only. Full Disclaimer

Generate Reports
Clear
Toast

This website stores cookies on your computer. These cookies are used to collect information about how you interact with our website and allow us to remember you. We use this information in order to improve and customize your browsing experience and for analytics and metrics about our visitors both on this website and other media. To find out more about the cookies we use, see our Privacy Policy.

Accept