Bally’s Corporation
Rating Overview
Rating Criteria
Rating Criteria Detail
Corporate Weaponization
Criteria:
Has canceled customers, suppliers, or vendors due to their political views or religious beliefs OR corporately boycotts, divests, or sanctions regions, people groups, or industries.
Risk Level:
LowerRationale:
Bally’s Corporation has not publicly canceled customers, suppliers, or vendors based on political views or religious beliefs (1).
Criteria:
Charitable giving (including employee matching programs) policies or practices discriminate against charitable organizations based on views or religious beliefs.
Risk Level:
LowerCriteria:
Employment policies fail to protect against viewpoint or other discrimination and/or are ideological in nature.
Risk Level:
HighRationale:
In 2025, a Bally’s casino in Chicago was sued by the Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty. This came as a result of Bally’s decision to sell a 25% equity stake in its new resort, but only make it available to women and minorities (1)(2). Bally’s requires its employees to take diversity and non-discrimination training (3). The company appears to prioritize diversity over merit in its hiring and leadership composition. From a Chicago News Weekly Article: “According to the HCA, minorities will occupy 60% of the jobs at the casino, and at least 45% of the workforce will be women” (4). Also, from its ESG page: “Bally’s is committed to maintaining a diverse make-up of our Board of Directors, including diversity of race, gender, ethnicity and experience” (5). The company does not provide viewpoint protections for its employees (6).
Corporate Governance and Public Policy
Criteria:
Uses corporate reputation to support causes, organizations, or policies hostile to freedom of expression.
Risk Level:
HighRationale:
Bally’s supports DEI within its business practices, employing a DEI Executive (1). The company supports ESG within its business practices. From its website: “Bally’s has created an ESG Steering Committee to oversee and provide executive sponsorship for our corporate ESG strategy, goals and initiatives” (2).
Criteria:
Uses corporate funds to advance ideological causes, organizations, or policies hostile to freedom of expression.
Risk Level:
Medium