Bausch Health

Industries Health Care Equipment and Services
Subsidiaries Bausch + Lomb, Medicis Pharmaceuticals, OraPharma, Salix Pharmaceuticals, Solta Medical
Location Canada
(Along with 69 other companies)

Rating Overview

Risk Rating: Medium

Bausch Health is Medium Risk.

Bausch Health is Medium Risk. The company often yields to political activism in shaping corporate governance, potentially alienating consumers, dividing employees, and harming shareholders. The company elevates merit, excellence, and integrity ahead of race and identity-based policies. Bausch Health occasionally embraces corporate initiatives that redirect its central focus from business goals to partisan policies and divisive issues at times. This approach fails to safeguard free exercise, free speech, and free enterprise.

Rating Criteria

Corporate Weaponization Risk Levels
Criteria Risk Level
Cancellations Medium Risk
Discriminatory Philanthropy Lower Risk
Employment Protection High Risk

Corporate Weaponization

Corporate Governance and Public Policy Risk Levels
Criteria Risk Level
Advocacy Bias Lower Risk
Funding Medium Risk
Political Actions No Data

Corporate Governance and Public Policy

Rating Criteria Detail

Criteria Risk Level Rationale

Corporate Weaponization


Criteria:

Has canceled customers, suppliers, or vendors due to their political views or religious beliefs OR corporately boycotts, divests, or sanctions regions, people groups, or industries.

Risk Level:

Medium

Rationale:

Bausch Health integrates ESG into its business practices. “As chairman and CEO, I am committed to continue integrating ESG standards and guidelines into our business and overall strategy” (1). The company has not publicly canceled customers, suppliers, or vendors based on political views or religious beliefs (2).

Criteria:

Charitable giving (including employee matching programs) policies or practices discriminate against charitable organizations based on views or religious beliefs.

Risk Level:

Lower

Rationale:

Bausch Health does not appear to discriminate against charitable organizations based on views or beliefs. The company’s charitable giving focus areas are “disease prevention, improving patient outcomes and lives, and education and community support related to our core businesses” (1)(2).

Criteria:

Employment policies fail to protect against viewpoint or other discrimination and/or are ideological in nature.

Risk Level:

High

Rationale:

In April 2026, America First Legal filed a lawsuit against Icahn Capital and Bausch + Lomb on behalf of a senior portfolio manager at Icahn Capital over discriminatory practices in board recruitment (1)(2)(3). Bausch Health does not provide viewpoint protections for its employees (4).

Corporate Governance and Public Policy


Criteria:

Uses corporate reputation to support causes, organizations, or policies hostile to freedom of expression.

Risk Level:

Lower

Rationale:

Bausch Health has not supported ideological causes or policies (1).

Criteria:

Uses corporate funds to advance ideological causes, organizations, or policies hostile to freedom of expression.

Risk Level:

Medium

Rationale:

Bausch Health is a corporate partner of the National LGBT Chamber of Commerce (1). Otherwise, there are no publicly known cases of the company using corporate funds to advance ideological causes, organizations, or policies (2).

Criteria:

Uses corporate political actions and/or financial contributions for ideological, non-business purposes.

Risk Level:

N/A

Rationale:

Bausch Health does not operate a PAC at this time and has not reported on its lobbying (1)(2)(3).