Blue Shield of California
Companies that likely use Benevity to vet charitable recipients, thereby discriminating against mainstream advocacy organizations through the SPLC's overly broad "Hate List."
These companies are committed to leveraging shareholder or investor assets for net-zero emission goals and climate ambitions for GFANZ, Climate Action 100+, CERES, PCAF, UN PRI, NZLA, FIT, or HSCP.
Companies that offer so-called transgender healthcare for their employees and covered dependents.
Rating Overview
Rating Criteria
Rating Criteria Detail
Corporate Weaponization
Criteria:
Has canceled customers, suppliers, or vendors due to their political views or religious beliefs OR corporately boycotts, divests, or sanctions regions, people groups, or industries.
Risk Level:
MediumRationale:
Blue Shield of California received a score of 70 on the 2025 Corporate Equality Index (CEI) from the Human Rights Campaign (HRC), a political stakeholder group. The company recruits employees based on sexual identity issues. The company discriminates against vendors that do not promote divisive sex and gender policies, indicating it prioritizes sexual issues over merit (1)(2). The company integrates ESG into its business practices. From its Supplier Code of Conduct: “Blue Shield may request Suppliers to participate in our Supplier Sustainability Program if the greenhouse gas emissions associated with their contracts are deemed high enough to be included. It is expected that Suppliers participate in the Supplier Sustainability Program if asked to participate” (3). However, the company has not canceled customers, suppliers, or vendors based on political views or religious beliefs (4).
Criteria:
Charitable giving (including employee matching programs) policies or practices discriminate against charitable organizations based on views or religious beliefs.
Risk Level:
HighRationale:
Blue Shield of California’s HRC 2025 CEI rating indicates the company will not donate to non-religious charities unless they embrace controversial sexual identity policies (1)(2). The company likely uses Benevity as its charitable giving platform. Benevity vets charities according to the Southern Poverty Law Center’s Hate List, which includes mainstream libertarian, conservative, family, and religious advocacy organizations (3)(4)(5).
Criteria:
Employment policies fail to protect against viewpoint or other discrimination and/or are ideological in nature.
Risk Level:
HighRationale:
Blue Shield of California appears to prioritize diversity over merit in its supply chain. From its Supplier Code of Conduct: “All Suppliers are eligible to participate in the Blue Shield Supplier Diversity Program. Majority prime Suppliers participate by providing subcontracting opportunities for verified Diverse Suppliers. Diverse Suppliers are certified small businesses and those that are fifty-one percent (51%) or more owned and operated by women, minority, disabled veterans or LGBT (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender) individuals” (1). The company requires implicit bias and DEI training for its employees (2). The company does not provide viewpoint protections for its employees (3).
Corporate Governance and Public Policy
Criteria:
Uses corporate reputation to support causes, organizations, or policies hostile to freedom of expression.
Risk Level:
HighRationale:
Blue Shield of California was a signatory of the Health Sector Climate Pledge, committing itself to achieve net zero emissions by 2050. Signatories were expected to develop and release a climate resilience plan and appoint a corporate executive to oversee its implementation (1). The company supports DEI within its business practices. From its Blue Shield of California 2023 Mission Report: “Embed diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) into all areas of the organization, including learning and development. Notably, more than 85% of people leaders have engaged in inclusive leadership courses. Foundational diversity, equity and inclusion and health equity courses are also available for all employees” (2). “Blue Shield of California committed to set targets with the Science Based Targets Initiative (SBTi), which has established the most rigorous and clearly-defined pathway for companies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to meet goals of the Paris Climate Accords” (3).
Criteria:
Uses corporate funds to advance ideological causes, organizations, or policies hostile to freedom of expression.
Risk Level:
HighRationale:
Blue Shield of California’s HRC 2025 CEI rating indicates the company covers transgender related costs for its employees and their children, including paid short-term leave, puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, chest surgeries, genital surgeries, medical visits and lab monitoring, travel and lodging. By allowing a political stakeholder group to dictate operations, the company increases health care costs and risks dividing employees, alienating customers and harming shareholders (1)(2). The company sponsored the Oakland Pride Parade (3). Otherwise, there are no publicly known cases of the company using corporate funds to advance ideological causes, organizations, or policies (4).