Boyd Gaming

Industries Media and Entertainment
Activism

Companies who use Benevity for charitable donations, who discriminates against mainstream advocacy organizations by using the SPLC's overly-broad "Hate List" to screen charities

Rating Overview

Risk Rating: Medium

Boyd Gaming is Medium Risk.

Boyd Gaming is Medium Risk. The company often yields to political activism in shaping corporate governance, potentially alienating consumers, dividing employees, and harming shareholders. The company implements race and identity-based policies that replace merit, excellence, and integrity with preferential treatment and outcomes. Boyd Gaming occasionally embraces corporate initiatives that redirect its central focus from business goals to partisan policies and divisive issues at times. This approach fails to safeguard free exercise, free speech, and free enterprise.

Rating Criteria

Corporate Weaponization Risk Levels
Criteria Risk Level
Cancellations Lower Risk
Discriminatory Philanthropy High Risk
Employment Protection High Risk

Corporate Weaponization

Corporate Governance and Public Policy Risk Levels
Criteria Risk Level
Advocacy Bias High Risk
Funding Lower Risk
Political Actions Lower Risk

Corporate Governance and Public Policy

Rating Criteria Detail

Criteria Risk Level Rationale

Corporate Weaponization


Criteria:

Has canceled customers, suppliers, or vendors due to their political views or religious beliefs OR corporately boycotts, divests, or sanctions regions, people groups, or industries.

Risk Level:

Lower

Rationale:

Boyd Gaming has not publicly canceled customers, suppliers, or vendors based on political views or religious beliefs (1).

Criteria:

Charitable giving (including employee matching programs) policies or practices discriminate against charitable organizations based on views or religious beliefs.

Risk Level:

High

Rationale:

Boyd Gaming likely uses Benevity as its charitable giving platform. Benevity vets charities according to the Southern Poverty Law Center’s Hate List, which includes mainstream libertarian, conservative, family, and religious advocacy organizations (1)(2)(3).

Criteria:

Employment policies fail to protect against viewpoint or other discrimination and/or are ideological in nature.

Risk Level:

High

Rationale:

Boyd Gaming requires its employees to take diversity awareness training (1). The company operates an inclusive supplier program. “Through our focus on engaging locally-owned businesses, women-owned business enterprises (WBEs), minority-owned business enterprises (MBEs) and veteran-owned business enterprises, we provide opportunities for a wider range of business owners” (2). The company does not provide viewpoint protections for its employees (3).

Corporate Governance and Public Policy


Criteria:

Uses corporate reputation to support causes, organizations, or policies hostile to freedom of expression.

Risk Level:

High

Rationale:

Boyd Gaming supports DEI within its business practices, employing a Diversity Council (1). The company supports DEI within its business practices. From its Diversity at Boyd webpage: “Diversity & Inclusion is an integral part of our business strategy” (2). The company supports ESG within its business practices. From a statement made by the company’s CEO, Keith Smith: “We believe our firm commitment to ESG makes us a stronger Company and is the foundation upon which we fulfill our goal of creating long term shareholder value” (3).

Criteria:

Uses corporate funds to advance ideological causes, organizations, or policies hostile to freedom of expression.

Risk Level:

Lower

Rationale:

Boyd Gaming has not used corporate funds to advance ideological causes, organizations, or policies (1).

Criteria:

Uses corporate political actions and/or financial contributions for ideological, non-business purposes.

Risk Level:

Lower

Rationale:

Boyd Gaming has not used its PAC donations or lobbying for ideological purposes (1)(2)(3).