Expensify
Rating Overview
Rating Criteria
Rating Criteria Detail
Corporate Weaponization
Criteria:
Has canceled customers, suppliers, or vendors due to their political views or religious beliefs OR corporately boycotts, divests, or sanctions regions, people groups, or industries.
Risk Level:
LowerRationale:
Expensify has not publicly canceled customers, suppliers, or vendors based on political views or religious beliefs (1).
Criteria:
Charitable giving (including employee matching programs) policies or practices discriminate against charitable organizations based on views or religious beliefs.
Risk Level:
LowerCriteria:
Employment policies fail to protect against viewpoint or other discrimination and/or are ideological in nature.
Risk Level:
HighRationale:
Expensify appears to prioritize diversity over merit in its hiring. From its ESG page: “We are committed to eliminating bias in how we hire and compensate our employees, including equity-based hiring strategies” (1). The company offers a DEI video series (2). It does not provide viewpoint protections for its employees (3)(4).
Corporate Governance and Public Policy
Criteria:
Uses corporate reputation to support causes, organizations, or policies hostile to freedom of expression.
Risk Level:
HighRationale:
Expensify CEO David Barrett sent a letter to all Expensify customers attacking Donald Trump and urging them to all vote for Joe Biden in the 2020 presidential election (1). The company’s CEO David Barrett also issued a statement attacking companies that did not suspend political giving to Republican election objectors (2).
Criteria:
Uses corporate funds to advance ideological causes, organizations, or policies hostile to freedom of expression.
Risk Level:
MediumRationale:
Expensify donates $0.25 for every $1 the company pays to its white male employees to equity-focused charitable organizations (1). The company has also created giving campaigns for climate change and inequality-focused organizations (2). Otherwise, there are no publicly known cases of the company using corporate funds to advance ideological causes, organizations, or policies (3).