Ferrero Group
Rating Overview
Rating Criteria
Rating Criteria Detail
Corporate Weaponization
Criteria:
Has canceled customers, suppliers, or vendors due to their political views or religious beliefs OR corporately boycotts, divests, or sanctions regions, people groups, or industries.
Risk Level:
LowerRationale:
Ferrero has not publicly canceled customers, suppliers, or vendors based on political views or religious beliefs (1).
Criteria:
Charitable giving (including employee matching programs) policies or practices discriminate against charitable organizations based on views or religious beliefs.
Risk Level:
LowerCriteria:
Employment policies fail to protect against viewpoint or other discrimination and/or are ideological in nature.
Risk Level:
HighRationale:
Ferrero is a founding member of Catalyst’s Measuring for Change Community, indicating its support of DEI in its leadership composition through the establishment of gender and racial targets (1)(2). Ferrero offers DEI training to its employees. Ferrero requires its line managers to take inclusion training. Ferrero appears to prioritize diversity over merit in its recruitment. From its 2023 Human Rights Report: “In the last 18 months, key developments have included embedding D&I into our recruitment process” (3)(4). Ferrero protects its employees against viewpoint discrimination (5).
Corporate Governance and Public Policy
Criteria:
Uses corporate reputation to support causes, organizations, or policies hostile to freedom of expression.
Risk Level:
MediumRationale:
Ferrero supports DEI within its business practices, employing a Global DEI Manager, Regional DEI Ambassadors, and DEI Councils. Ferrero supports DEI within its business practices. From its Diversity, Equity and Inclusion page: “Diversity, Equity & Inclusion is not only a responsibility, it is a business driver and a key enabler for our success in the coming years” (1). Ferrero is aligned with the Paris Agreement, which entails a commitment to net-zero carbon emissions by 2050 (2). Otherwise, Ferrero has not supported ideological causes or policies (3).
Criteria:
Uses corporate funds to advance ideological causes, organizations, or policies hostile to freedom of expression.
Risk Level:
Lower