Rumble
Rating Overview
Rating Criteria
Rating Criteria Detail
Corporate Weaponization
Criteria:
Has canceled customers, suppliers, or vendors due to their political views or religious beliefs OR corporately boycotts, divests, or sanctions regions, people groups, or industries.
Risk Level:
LowerRationale:
Rumble has formed partnerships with individuals that have been shunned by other companies for political reasons (1). The company has prided itself on being an open discussion-focused platform and distanced itself from other platforms that have censored certain forms of speech (2). The company has made a deal with former President Trump and Truth Social, his company’s social media network, to operate as a part of the same business (3). However, it does not remove or limit opinions that are different from those of Mr. Trump; in fact, the company has offered financial support to dissenting users to demonstrate that the site is “hospitable” to all perspectives (4). The company has not publicly canceled customers, suppliers, or vendors based on political views or religious beliefs (5).
Criteria:
Charitable giving (including employee matching programs) policies or practices discriminate against charitable organizations based on views or religious beliefs.
Risk Level:
N/ARationale:
Rumble does not publish charitable giving guidelines (1).
Criteria:
Employment policies fail to protect against viewpoint or other discrimination and/or are ideological in nature.
Risk Level:
MediumRationale:
Rumble does not provide viewpoint protections for its employees (1).
Corporate Governance and Public Policy
Criteria:
Uses corporate reputation to support causes, organizations, or policies hostile to freedom of expression.
Risk Level:
LowerRationale:
Rumble made a deal with former President Trump and Truth Social, his company’s social media network, to operate as a part of the same business (1). However, the company does not remove or limit opinions that are different from those of Mr. Trump; in fact, the company has offered financial support to dissenting users to demonstrate that the site is “hospitable” to all perspectives (2). The company has not supported ideological causes or policies (3).
Criteria:
Uses corporate funds to advance ideological causes, organizations, or policies hostile to freedom of expression.
Risk Level:
LowerRationale:
Rumble has not used corporate funds to advance ideological causes, organizations, or policies (1).