Sirius XM
The biggest 1000 U.S. companies by revenue according to form 10-K.
Companies who were members of the Global Alliance for Responsible Media, which subjectively demonetized advertisements and suppressed content to stifle mainstream perspectives online
Companies that offer so-called transgender healthcare for their employees and covered dependents.
Rating Overview
Rating Criteria
Rating Criteria Detail
Corporate Weaponization
Criteria:
Has canceled customers, suppliers, or vendors due to their political views or religious beliefs OR corporately boycotts, divests, or sanctions regions, people groups, or industries.
Risk Level:
MediumRationale:
Sirius XM received a score of 85 on the 2025 Corporate Equality Index (CEI) from the Human Rights Campaign (HRC), a political stakeholder group. The company recruits employees based on sexual identity issues. The company discriminates against vendors that do not promote divisive sex and gender policies, indicating it prioritizes sexual issues over merit (1)(2). The company was a member of the Global Alliance for Responsible Media, which demonetized and suppressed content that it deemed to spread “hate speech” or “misinformation”, discuss “debated social issues in a negative or partisan context”, or “vilif[y]” individuals based on sexual orientation and gender identity. These arbitrary guidelines were used to censor mainstream perspectives online (3)(4)(5). The company has a written policy pledging to vet vendors for LGBTQ policies. Its Code of Ethics requires vendors to include sexual orientation and gender identity in their nondiscrimination policy (6). However, the company has not publicly canceled customers, suppliers, or vendors based on political views or religious beliefs (7).
Criteria:
Charitable giving (including employee matching programs) policies or practices discriminate against charitable organizations based on views or religious beliefs.
Risk Level:
HighCriteria:
Employment policies fail to protect against viewpoint or other discrimination and/or are ideological in nature.
Risk Level:
HighRationale:
Sirius XM’s HRC 2025 CEI rating indicates the company forces employees to attend multiple, controversial trainings on gender identity, sexual orientation, transgender issues, and divisive racial ideology. The company provides gender transition guidelines for its employees and a specific benefits guide with a comprehensive explanation of transgender services funded by the company (1)(2). The company appears to prioritize diversity over merit in its recruitment, hiring, promotion, and leadership composition (3)(4). The company requires employees to take unconscious bias training (5). However, Sirius XM protects its employees against viewpoint discrimination (6).
Corporate Governance and Public Policy
Criteria:
Uses corporate reputation to support causes, organizations, or policies hostile to freedom of expression.
Risk Level:
HighRationale:
Sirius XM celebrates LGBTQ Pride Month with special music channels for the LGBTQ community (1). The company hosts workshops on race, allyship, stereotypes, inclusive language, and how diversity drives innovation (2). The company supports DEI within its business practices, claiming that “DE&I must be central to every business decision we make” (3). The company launched the Stand for Sonic Diversity campaign which advocates for companies to implement racial quotas in voice casting and the integration of DEI in all casting and scripting decisions (4)(5).
Criteria:
Uses corporate funds to advance ideological causes, organizations, or policies hostile to freedom of expression.
Risk Level:
HighRationale:
Sirius XM’s HRC 2025 CEI rating indicates the company covers transgender related costs for its employees and their children, including paid short-term leave, puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, chest surgeries, genital surgeries, medical visits and lab monitoring, travel and lodging. By allowing a political stakeholder group to dictate operations, the company increases health care costs and risks dividing employees, alienating customers and harming shareholders (1)(2). The company was a member of the Global Alliance for Responsible Media and was a partner of the HRC’s Foundation (3)(4)(5)(6).