Stride Learning
Rating Overview
Rating Criteria
Rating Criteria Detail
Corporate Weaponization
Criteria:
Has canceled customers, suppliers, or vendors due to their political views or religious beliefs OR corporately boycotts, divests, or sanctions regions, people groups, or industries.
Risk Level:
MediumRationale:
Stride Learning integrates ESG into its business practices. From its 2021 ESG Report: “Our unwavering commitment to understanding
and managing our risks, opportunities, and impacts
related to ESG will continue to inform our work” (1). However, the company has not publicly canceled customers, suppliers, or vendors based on political views or religious beliefs (2).
Criteria:
Charitable giving (including employee matching programs) policies or practices discriminate against charitable organizations based on views or religious beliefs.
Risk Level:
N/ARationale:
Stride Learning does not publish charitable giving guidelines (1).
Corporate Governance and Public Policy
Criteria:
Uses corporate reputation to support causes, organizations, or policies hostile to freedom of expression.
Risk Level:
HighRationale:
Stride Learning‘s CEO, James Rhyu, signed the CEO Action for Diversity & Inclusion pledge, which includes a commitment to promote DEI through bias education training in the workplace, strategize on DEI programs/initiatives with other signatories, and engage boards of directors when developing and evaluating DEI strategies (1)(2). The company supports DEI within its business practices, hosting a DEI Committee (3). Stride Learning supports ESG within its business practices. From its 2021 ESG Report: “Understanding and managing our risks,
opportunities, and impacts related to ESG is not a responsibility we take lightly” (4). Stride Learning used its newsroom to support a transgender student who moved to online learning after not being granted a name change by the school (5). The company has voiced support for the BLM movement (6).
Criteria:
Uses corporate funds to advance ideological causes, organizations, or policies hostile to freedom of expression.
Risk Level:
Medium