The Children’s Place, Inc.

Industries Consumer Durables and Apparel
Subsidiaries Gymboree, Sugar & Jade,

Rating Overview

Risk Rating: Medium

The Children’s Place, Inc. is Medium Risk.

The Children’s Place, Inc. is Medium Risk. The company often yields to political activism in shaping corporate governance, potentially alienating consumers, dividing employees, and harming shareholders. The company implements race and identity-based policies that replace merit, excellence, and integrity with preferential treatment and outcomes. The company occasionally embraces corporate initiatives that redirect its central focus from business goals to partisan policies and divisive issues at times. This approach fails to safeguard free exercise, free speech, and free enterprise.

Rating Criteria

Corporate Weaponization Risk Levels
Criteria Risk Level
Cancellations Medium Risk
Discriminatory Philanthropy High Risk
Employment Protection High Risk

Corporate Weaponization

Corporate Governance and Public Policy Risk Levels
Criteria Risk Level
Advocacy Bias High Risk
Funding Lower Risk
Political Actions No Data

Corporate Governance and Public Policy

Rating Criteria Detail

Criteria Risk Level Rationale

Corporate Weaponization


Criteria:

Has canceled customers, suppliers, or vendors due to their political views or religious beliefs OR corporately boycotts, divests, or sanctions regions, people groups, or industries.

Risk Level:

Medium

Rationale:

The Children’s Place integrates ESG into its business practices. From its 2024 Proxy Statement: “The fiscal 2023 PRSU performance metrics reflect the continued use of (i) the Company’s core historical performance metrics, (ii) a relative adjusted ROIC modifier, and (iii) two ESG-based metrics consisting of (a) the percentage use of Better Cotton in the Company’s products, and (b) the percentage representation by
Black/African American associates at the Company’s U.S. corporate offices” (1). The company promotes divisive sex and gender policies. Its Vendor Code of Conduct requires international vendors to include sexual orientation in their nondiscrimination policy (2). However, the company has not canceled customers, suppliers, or vendors based on political views or religious beliefs (3).

Criteria:

Charitable giving (including employee matching programs) policies or practices discriminate against charitable organizations based on views or religious beliefs.

Risk Level:

High

Rationale:

The Children’s Place will not match employee donations to “Religious organizations where the sole purpose or primary purpose of the organization is the operation of a church, synagogue, or other place of religious worship at which non-profit religious services and activities are conducted” (1). “The Children’s Place donates clothing, money and time to local and national organizations that support children and families in need” (2).

Criteria:

Employment policies fail to protect against viewpoint or other discrimination and/or are ideological in nature.

Risk Level:

High

Rationale:

The Children’s Place requires its leadership team to take DEI training (1). The company appears to prioritize diversity over merit in its business structure through the establishment of gender and racial targets for its recruitment, hiring, and leadership composition. The company is seeking to “Double representation of Black/African American associates at our U.S. corporate
offices by end of FY25, Maintain at least 80% representation of women in our overall workforce, and Maintain at least 50% representation of women in our corporate leadership positions” (2). The Children’s Place has a history of divisive corporate policies and practices. However, in 2025, the company removed DEI training and its public gender and racial targets from its reports, and it has not published any sustainability reports since 2023. To date, the company has not publicly addressed these changes, leaving shareholders without clarity regarding the company’s reasoning or future direction (3). The company does not provide viewpoint protections for its employees (4).

Corporate Governance and Public Policy


Criteria:

Uses corporate reputation to support causes, organizations, or policies hostile to freedom of expression.

Risk Level:

High

Rationale:

The Children’s Place supports ESG within its business practices. From its 2022 ESG Report: “The Children’s Place has made great
strides in integrating ESG into every
aspect of its operations, from the
use of sustainable sourcing and
ecologically-conscious production
methods, to diversity in leadership
and employment at every level, to
enhanced Board governance” (1). The company supports DEI within its business practices. From its 2022 ESG Report: “Our commitment to Diversity, Equity and Inclusion is in our DNA and we remain steadfast in our support to partners with a mandate to fight discrimination, inequality and racial injustice” (2). The Children’s Place has a history of divisive corporate policies and practices. However, in 2025, the company removed DEI and ESG language from its reports, and it has not published any sustainability reports since 2023. To date, the company has not publicly addressed these changes, leaving shareholders without clarity regarding the company’s reasoning or future direction (3).

Criteria:

Uses corporate funds to advance ideological causes, organizations, or policies hostile to freedom of expression.

Risk Level:

Lower

Rationale:

The Children’s Place has not used corporate funds to advance ideological causes, organizations, or policies (1).

Criteria:

Uses corporate political actions and/or financial contributions for ideological, non-business purposes.

Risk Level:

N/A

Rationale:

The Children’s Place does not operate a PAC or engage in lobbying at this time (1)(2)(3).