Southern Company

Georgia Power, Alabama Power, Power Secure, Mississippi Power, Southern Power, Southern Nuclear, Atlanta Gas Light
Atlanta, Georgia
Energy

Corporate Bias Rating

Expand Summary

Risk Level:

Rating - Danger
High Risk

Summary:

Southern Power Company is High Risk. The company yields to political activism in shaping corporate governance, potentially alienating consumers, dividing employees, and harming shareholders. The company implements race and identity-based policies that replace merit, excellence, and integrity with preferential treatment and outcomes. Southern embraces corporate initiatives that redirect its central focus from business goals to partisan policies and divisive issues. This approach fails to safeguard free exercise, free speech, and free enterprise.

View Full Corporate Bias Ratings Report
Criteria
Risk Level
Rationale
Corporate Weaponization
Criteria

Has canceled customers, suppliers, or vendors due to their political views or religious beliefs OR corporately boycotts, divests, or sanctions regions, people groups, or industries.

Risk Level
Rationale

Southern Company received a score of 100 on the 2025 Corporate Equality Index (CEI) from the Human Rights Campaign (HRC), a political stakeholder group. The company recruits employees based on sexual identity issues. The company discriminates against vendors that do not promote divisive sex and gender policies, indicating it prioritizes sexual issues over merit (1)(2).  However, the company has not publicly canceled customers, suppliers, or vendors based on political views or religious beliefs (3).

Criteria

Charitable giving (including employee matching programs) policies or practices discriminate against charitable organizations based on views or religious beliefs.

Risk Level
Rationale

Southern Company’s HRC 2025 CEI rating indicates the company will not donate to non-religious charities unless they embrace controversial sexual identity policies (1)(2). However, the company does not appear to discriminate against charitable organizations based on views or beliefs (3)(4). The company’s charitable giving focus areas are “arts and culture, health and human services, civic and community projects, safety, education and the environment” (5).

Criteria

Employment policies fail to protect against viewpoint or other discrimination and/or are ideological in nature.

Risk Level
Rationale

Southern Company’s HRC 2025 CEI rating indicates the company forces employees to attend multiple, controversial trainings on gender identity, sexual orientation, transgender issues, and divisive racial ideology. The company provides gender transition guidelines for its employees and a specific benefits guide with a comprehensive explanation of transgender services funded by the company (1)(2). The company highlights its unconscious and inclusive bias training required for all employees (3). However, the company does not provide viewpoint protections for its employees (4).

Corporate Governance and Public Policy
Criteria

Uses corporate reputation to support causes, organizations, or policies hostile to freedom of expression.

Risk Level
Rationale

Southern Company’s HRC 2025 CEI rating indicates the company agrees to allow a controversial stakeholder group focused on sexual identity issues to dictate marketing or advertising strategy. By doing so, the company risks dividing employees, alienating customers and harming shareholders (1)(2). The company’s CEO is a member of the Business Roundtable and signed its 2019 Statement on the Purpose of a Corporation, which promotes stakeholder capitalism over traditional obligations to shareholders (3)(4). The company commits to being an “anti-racist” company (5). The company’s former CEO, Tom Fanning, signed the CEO Action for Diversity & Inclusion pledge, which includes a commitment to promote DEI through bias education training in the workplace (6)(7). The company is committed to net zero emissions by 2050 (8).

Criteria

Uses corporate funds to advance ideological causes, organizations, or policies hostile to freedom of expression.

Risk Level
Rationale

Southern Company’s HRC 2025 CEI rating indicates the company covers transgender related costs for its employees and their children, including paid short-term leave, puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, chest surgeries, genital surgeries, medical visits and lab monitoring, travel and lodging. Additionally, the company has pledged philanthropic support of at least one organization or event that promotes sex and gender ideology. By allowing a political stakeholder group to dictate operations, the company increases health care costs and risks dividing employees, alienating customers and harming shareholders (1)(2). The company has donated to Planned Parenthood and donated $200 million to racial equity and social justice causes, including $50 million to a net zero carbon future (3)(4). Otherwise, there are no publicly known cases of the company using corporate funds to advance ideological causes, organizations, or policies (5)(6).

Criteria

Uses corporate political actions and/or financial contributions for ideological, non-business purposes.

Risk Level
Rationale

Southern Company’s HRC 2025 CEI rating indicates the company publicly advocated for controversial sex and gender ideology through local, state or federal legislation or initiatives. By allowing a political stakeholder group to dictate operations, the company risks dividing employees, alienating customers and harming shareholders (1)(2). The company has not used its PAC donations for ideological purposes (3)(4). In 2021 and 2022, the company lobbied for the “Methane Emissions Reduction Act of 2021” (5)(6).

Board Bias

Expand Summary

CEO of Southern Company

Chris Womack

Chris Womack

Summary:

Headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, Southern Company is a member of the Fortune 250 operating in the Energy industry. Chris Womack and Thomas A. Fanning serve as CEO/President and Chairman, respectively, leading the company’s C-suite executive team and the board of directors. Amongst these teams, the collective leadership is responsible for $480,157 to Republican causes and $746,223 to Democratic causes. Under their tenure, Southern Company currently holds a 'High Risk' risk rating.

View Full Board Bias Report

Political Contributions of Leadership:

$480,157

$746,223

Republican

Democrat

Shareholder Proposals

Expand Summary

Date
ESG Category
Proponent
Summary of ResolutionMgmt RecTotal Vote % in Favor
5/22/24GovernanceJohn CheveddenSimple Majority VoteAgainst39.49%
5/22/24EnvironmentalMercy Investment ServicesDisclose GHG Emissions Reductions TargetsAgainst9.27%
5/24/23EnvironmentalAs You SowStockholder proposal regarding setting Scope 3 GHG targetsAgainst18.64%
5/24/23EnvironmentalMr. Steven J. MilloyStockholder proposal regarding issuing annual report on feasibility of reaching net zeroAgainst0.00%
5/24/23GovernanceJohn CheveddenSimple Majority VoteAgainst38.00%
5/24/23EnvironmentalAs You SowSet Scope 3 GHG TargetsAgainst19.80%
5/24/23EnvironmentalSteven MilloyAnnual Report on Feasibility of Reaching Net-zero Carbon EmissionsAgainst0.00%
Generate Reports
Clear
Toast