Godiva
Rating Overview
Rating Criteria
Rating Criteria Detail
Corporate Weaponization
Criteria:
Has canceled customers, suppliers, or vendors due to their political views or religious beliefs OR corporately boycotts, divests, or sanctions regions, people groups, or industries.
Risk Level:
MediumRationale:
Godiva integrates ESG into its business practices. From its Responsible Cocoa Commitment: the company expects suppliers to “progressively reduce GHG emissions… In the event that the supplier does not want to engage in progress towards meeting our cocoa commitment GODIVA will review its relationship with that supplier and may cease the relationship” (1). However, the company has not publicly canceled customers, suppliers, or vendors based on political views or religious beliefs (2).
Criteria:
Charitable giving (including employee matching programs) policies or practices discriminate against charitable organizations based on views or religious beliefs.
Risk Level:
LowerCriteria:
Employment policies fail to protect against viewpoint or other discrimination and/or are ideological in nature.
Risk Level:
MediumRationale:
Godiva does not provide viewpoint protections for its employees (1).
Corporate Governance and Public Policy
Criteria:
Uses corporate reputation to support causes, organizations, or policies hostile to freedom of expression.
Risk Level:
MediumRationale:
Godiva supports DEI within its business practices. From its Lady GODIVA Initiative page: “At GODIVA, we are dedicated to fostering a culture that champions diversity, equity and inclusion and promises to open people’s eyes to a more wonderful world” (1). Otherwise, there are no publicly known cases of the company using its reputation to advance ideological causes or policies (2).
Criteria:
Uses corporate funds to advance ideological causes, organizations, or policies hostile to freedom of expression.
Risk Level:
HighRationale:
Godiva was a Bronze partner of PFLAG, an LGBTQ+ activist group that promotes books for children with sexually explicit and gender fluid content and advocates against laws that inform parents of their child’s gender dysphoria or prevent unapproved transgender medical treatments for minors (1)(2)(3). The company funded Young Women’s Trust, Womenpreneur, and the Canadian Women’s Foundation (4)(5)(6)(7). Otherwise, there are no publicly known cases of the company using corporate funds to advance ideological causes, organizations, or policies (8).