Loomis, Sayles & Company
These companies are committed to leveraging shareholder or investor assets for net-zero emission goals and climate ambitions for GFANZ, Climate Action 100+, CERES, PCAF, UN PRI, NZLA, FIT, or HSCP.
Rating Overview
Rating Criteria
Rating Criteria Detail
Corporate Weaponization
Criteria:
Has canceled customers, suppliers, or vendors due to their political views or religious beliefs OR corporately boycotts, divests, or sanctions regions, people groups, or industries.
Risk Level:
MediumRationale:
Loomis Sayles integrates ESG into all of its business practices. Loomis Sayles stated, “we believe the best way to consider ESG is through integration that aims to identify the financial materiality of ESG factors.” (1)(2). Loomis Sayles is a signatory of the Principles for Responsible Investment, incorporating ESG issues into investment analysis, decision-making, and other business practices (3)(4). However, Loomis Sayles has not publicly canceled customers, suppliers, or vendors based on political views or religious beliefs (5).
Criteria:
Charitable giving (including employee matching programs) policies or practices discriminate against charitable organizations based on views or religious beliefs.
Risk Level:
LowerRationale:
Loomis Sayles does not appear to discriminate against charitable organizations based on views or beliefs (1).
Corporate Governance and Public Policy
Criteria:
Uses corporate reputation to support causes, organizations, or policies hostile to freedom of expression.
Risk Level:
HighRationale:
Loomis Sayles is a member of Climate Action 100+, committed to carbon neutrality by 2050 (1)(2). The company is a signatory to the CFA Institute’s Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Code, indicating its support of DEI in its recruitment, hiring, onboarding, and promotions. Furthermore, the company pledges to integrate DEI into its policies, promote DEI in the investment industry, and provide regular reporting on its DEI metrics to the CFA Institute (3)(4)(5). Loomis Sayles supports DEI within its business practices, employing a DEI Officer (6).
Criteria:
Uses corporate funds to advance ideological causes, organizations, or policies hostile to freedom of expression.
Risk Level:
Lower