Nu Skin Enterprises

Industries Household and Personal Products
Subsidiaries https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1021561/000102156102000006/ex21-1.htm Nu Family Benefits Insurance Brokerage, Inc, Nu Skin Asia Investment, Inc., Nu Skin Enterprises Australia, Inc., Big Planet, Inc., Nu Skin Canada, Inc.
Activism

The biggest 3000 companies in the U.S. in the year of 2025.

Rating Overview

Risk Rating: Lower

Nu Skin Enterprises is Lower Risk.

Nu Skin Enterprises is Lower Risk. The company does not yield to political activism in shaping corporate governance, preventing initiatives that potentially alienate consumers, divide employees, and harm shareholders. The company elevates merit, excellence, and integrity ahead of race and identity-based policies. The company does not embrace corporate initiatives that redirect its central focus from business goals to partisan policies and divisive issues. This approach protects free exercise, free speech, and free enterprise

Rating Criteria

Corporate Weaponization Risk Levels
Criteria Risk Level
Cancellations Lower Risk
Discriminatory Philanthropy Lower Risk
Employment Protection High Risk

Corporate Weaponization

Corporate Governance and Public Policy Risk Levels
Criteria Risk Level
Advocacy Bias Medium Risk
Funding Medium Risk
Political Actions Lower Risk

Corporate Governance and Public Policy

Rating Criteria Detail

Criteria Risk Level Rationale

Corporate Weaponization


Criteria:

Has canceled customers, suppliers, or vendors due to their political views or religious beliefs OR corporately boycotts, divests, or sanctions regions, people groups, or industries.

Risk Level:

Lower

Rationale:

Nu Skin Enterprises has not publicly canceled customers, suppliers, or vendors based on political views or religious beliefs (1).

Criteria:

Charitable giving (including employee matching programs) policies or practices discriminate against charitable organizations based on views or religious beliefs.

Risk Level:

Lower

Rationale:

Nu Skin Enterprises does not appear to discriminate against charitable organizations based on views or beliefs (1).

Criteria:

Employment policies fail to protect against viewpoint or other discrimination and/or are ideological in nature.

Risk Level:

High

Rationale:

Nu Skin Enterprises requires its employees to complete DEI training (1)(2). Nu Skin Enterprises does not provide viewpoint protections for its employees (3).

Corporate Governance and Public Policy


Criteria:

Uses corporate reputation to support causes, organizations, or policies hostile to freedom of expression.

Risk Level:

Medium

Rationale:

Nu Skin Enterprises hosted an external art show from Raynbow Collective, featuring the work of LGBTQ+ students and alumni (1)(2)(3). Nu Skin supports DEI within its business practices, hosting a DEI Committee (4). Otherwise, there are no publicly known cases of Nu Skin Enterprises using its reputation to advance ideological causes or policies (5).

Criteria:

Uses corporate funds to advance ideological causes, organizations, or policies hostile to freedom of expression.

Risk Level:

Medium

Rationale:

Nu Skin was a corporate sponsor in the Utah Pride Festival and the Pride, Not Prejudice conference (1). Otherwise, there are no publicly known cases of Nu Skin Enterprises using corporate funds to advance ideological causes, organizations, or policies (2).

Criteria:

Uses corporate political actions and/or financial contributions for ideological, non-business purposes.

Risk Level:

Lower

Rationale:

Nu Skin Enterprises has not used its PAC donations or lobbying for ideological purposes (1)(2)(3).