BHG Financial
Rating Overview
Rating Criteria
Rating Criteria Detail
Corporate Weaponization
Criteria:
Has canceled customers, suppliers, or vendors due to their political views or religious beliefs OR corporately boycotts, divests, or sanctions regions, people groups, or industries.
Risk Level:
LowerRationale:
BHG Financial has not publicly canceled customers, suppliers, or vendors based on political views or religious beliefs (1).
Criteria:
Charitable giving (including employee matching programs) policies or practices discriminate against charitable organizations based on views or religious beliefs.
Risk Level:
LowerRationale:
BHG Financial does not appear to discriminate against charitable organizations based on views or beliefs. Its charitable giving focus areas are “healthcare, education, and ending poverty” (1).
Corporate Governance and Public Policy
Criteria:
Uses corporate reputation to support causes, organizations, or policies hostile to freedom of expression.
Risk Level:
HighRationale:
BHG Financial supports DEI within its business practices. From the company’s Chief Human Resources Officer: “Overall, diversity within a team drives better decision-making, enhances problem-solving capabilities, and ultimately leads to improved performance and competitiveness in the market” (1)(2). From its LinkedIn page: “We are committed to always fostering diversity, equity, and inclusion by making it a significant part of our values and culture at BHG Financial” (3). Otherwise, there are no publicly known cases of the company using its reputation to advance ideological causes or policies (4).
Criteria:
Uses corporate funds to advance ideological causes, organizations, or policies hostile to freedom of expression.
Risk Level:
MediumRationale:
BHG Financial was a Silver partner of PFLAG, an LGBTQ+ activist group that promotes books for children with sexually explicit and gender fluid content and advocates against laws that inform parents of their child’s gender dysphoria or prevent unapproved transgender medical treatments for minors (1)(2)(3). Otherwise, there are no publicly known cases of the company using corporate funds to advance ideological causes, organizations, or policies (4).