CAPTRUST
Rating Overview
Rating Criteria
Rating Criteria Detail
Corporate Weaponization
Criteria:
Has canceled customers, suppliers, or vendors due to their political views or religious beliefs OR corporately boycotts, divests, or sanctions regions, people groups, or industries.
Risk Level:
LowerRationale:
CAPTRUST has not publicly canceled customers, suppliers, or vendors based on political views or religious beliefs (1).
Criteria:
Charitable giving (including employee matching programs) policies or practices discriminate against charitable organizations based on views or religious beliefs.
Risk Level:
LowerCriteria:
Employment policies fail to protect against viewpoint or other discrimination and/or are ideological in nature.
Risk Level:
HighRationale:
CAPTRUST offers DEI training to its employees (1). The company appears to prioritize diversity over merit in its recruitment and leadership composition. From its Inclusion + Diversity at CAPTRUST: “Increase diversity of workforce and leadership team” (2). CAPTRUST does not provide viewpoint protections for its employees (3).
Corporate Governance and Public Policy
Criteria:
Uses corporate reputation to support causes, organizations, or policies hostile to freedom of expression.
Risk Level:
HighRationale:
CAPTRUST’s CEO, Fielding Miller, signed the CEO Action for Diversity & Inclusion pledge, which includes a commitment to promote DEI through bias education training in the workplace, strategize on DEI programs/initiatives with other signatories, and engage boards of directors when developing and evaluating DEI strategies (1)(2). The company supports DEI within its business practices, hosting a DEI Council (3). CAPTRUST supports DEI within its business practices. From its Inclusion + Diversity at CAPTRUST page: “We are committed to designing and implementing a framework for inclusion, diversity, and belonging” (4). The company featured Sarah Harris and Jenn McCabe from Armanino to discuss the importance of DEI in investing (5). Otherwise, there are no publicly known cases of the company using its reputation to advance ideological causes or policies (6).
Criteria:
Uses corporate funds to advance ideological causes, organizations, or policies hostile to freedom of expression.
Risk Level:
LowerRationale:
CAPTRUST has not use corporate funds to advance ideological causes, organizations, or policies (1).