Rockefeller Asset Management
These companies are committed to leveraging shareholder or investor assets for net-zero emission goals and climate ambitions for GFANZ, Climate Action 100+, CERES, PCAF, UN PRI, NZLA, FIT, or HSCP.
Rating Overview
Rating Criteria
Rating Criteria Detail
Corporate Weaponization
Criteria:
Has canceled customers, suppliers, or vendors due to their political views or religious beliefs OR corporately boycotts, divests, or sanctions regions, people groups, or industries.
Risk Level:
MediumRationale:
Rockefeller Asset Management is a signatory of the Principles for Responsible Investment, incorporating ESG issues into investment analysis, decision-making, and other business practices (1)(2). However, in 2025, the company removed DEI & ESG language, reports, and policies from its website. To date, the company has not publicly addressed these changes, leaving shareholders without clarity regarding the company’s reasoning or future direction (3)(4). However, the company has not publicly canceled customers, suppliers, or vendors based on political views or religious beliefs (5).
Criteria:
Charitable giving (including employee matching programs) policies or practices discriminate against charitable organizations based on views or religious beliefs.
Risk Level:
LowerCorporate Governance and Public Policy
Criteria:
Uses corporate reputation to support causes, organizations, or policies hostile to freedom of expression.
Risk Level:
HighRationale:
Rockefeller supports ESG within its business practices. From its press statement: “Our long-held belief, backed by academic studies and quantitative analysis, is that there may be alpha potential in investing in companies that are in the process of rapidly improving their ESG profiles, as opposed to those companies that are already leaders in the ESG space” (1). Rockefeller was part of the Net Zero Asset Managers initiative prior to NZAM’s suspension in 2025. Its membership indicated a commitment to carbon neutrality with its investments by 2050 (2)(3)(4). However, in 2025, the company removed DEI & ESG language, reports, and policies from its website. To date, the company has not publicly addressed these changes, leaving shareholders without clarity regarding the company’s reasoning or future direction (5)(6). Otherwise, there are no publicly known cases of the company using its reputation to advance ideological causes or policies (7).
Criteria:
Uses corporate funds to advance ideological causes, organizations, or policies hostile to freedom of expression.
Risk Level:
Medium