Carter Bank
The biggest 3000 companies in the U.S. in the year of 2025.
Rating Overview
Rating Criteria
Rating Criteria Detail
Corporate Weaponization
Criteria:
Has canceled customers, suppliers, or vendors due to their political views or religious beliefs OR corporately boycotts, divests, or sanctions regions, people groups, or industries.
Risk Level:
MediumRationale:
Criteria:
Charitable giving (including employee matching programs) policies or practices discriminate against charitable organizations based on views or religious beliefs.
Risk Level:
LowerRationale:
Carter Bank does not appear to discriminate against charitable organizations based on views or beliefs (1).
Criteria:
Employment policies fail to protect against viewpoint or other discrimination and/or are ideological in nature.
Risk Level:
HighRationale:
Carter Bank requires its employees to take diversity training (1). The company appears to prioritize diversity over merit in its recruitment. From its 2023 Annual Report: “We continue our commitment to equal employment opportunities by focusing on attracting, developing and retaining a diverse and inclusive workforce” (2). The company is an affirmative action employer. It lists “EOE/AA/M/F/Veteran/Disability” in its equal opportunity policy (3). The company does not provide viewpoint protections for its employees (4).
Corporate Governance and Public Policy
Criteria:
Uses corporate reputation to support causes, organizations, or policies hostile to freedom of expression.
Risk Level:
HighRationale:
Carter Bank supports DEI within its business practices, hosting a DEI Council (1). The company supports ESG within its business practices. From its 2023 Annual Report: “The Company has appointed an ESG Coordinator and has established an ESG Working Group to focus on, and measure the impact of the Company’s ESG programs and initiatives” (2).
Criteria:
Uses corporate funds to advance ideological causes, organizations, or policies hostile to freedom of expression.
Risk Level:
LowerRationale:
Carter Bank has not used corporate funds to advance ideological causes, organizations, or policies (1).